PA Advisors, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
NOTICE by PA Advisors, LLC re #336 Emergency SEALED MOTION to Compel Google, Inc. to Produce Complete Source Code and Product Documents Concerning Applied Semantics, Inc. and Kaltix Corporation and Emergency Motion for Extension of Expert Report Deadlines (Wiley, Elizabeth)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PA ADVISORS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § §
Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-480-RRR JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
nXn TECH, LLC'S NOTICE OF FILING EMERGENCY MOTION TO COMPEL GOOGLE, INC. TO PRODUCE COMPLETE SOURCE CODE AND PRODUCE DOCUMENTS CONCERNING APPLIED SEMANTICS, INC. AND KALTIX CORPORATION AND EMERGENCY MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES nXn Tech, LLC (f/k/a PA Advisors, LLC) ("nXn") respectfully files this notice to alert the Court that emergency relief is requested in the Motion entitled as indicated above given that (i) today Monday December 21, 2009 marks the close of the discovery period and Plaintiff nXn lacks complete source code for all the accused instrumentalities in this case (as to both Defendants); and (ii) nXn's deadline to serve expert reports on Yahoo!, Inc. ("Yahoo") and Google Inc. ("Google") (collectively, "Defendants"), also is today. Agreement as to an extended deadline has been reached with Google, but as of the time this motion is filed, no response has been obtained from counsel for Yahoo. In addition, the motion requests that this Court expedite its consideration of this motion by scheduling a hearing, if the Court's schedule permits, for Monday December 28, 2009, and requests the Court to order an expedited briefing schedule in light of that requested hearing date. Expedited consideration is requested given the importance of ensuring complete production of source code as soon as possible for nXn to properly prepare for trial and in light of upcoming deadlines, with jury selection set for March 2, 2010.
Dated: December 21, 2009
Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Elizabeth A. Wiley___________ Elizabeth A. Wiley
Andrew W. Spangler LEAD COUNSEL SPANGLER LAW P.C. 208 N. Green Street, Suite 300 Longview, Texas 75601 (903) 753-9300 (903) 553-0403 (fax) email@example.com David M. Pridham LAW OFFICE OF DAVID PRIDHAM 25 Linden Road Barrington, Rhode Island 02806 (401) 633-7247 (401) 633-7247 (fax) firstname.lastname@example.org John M. Bustamante Texas Bar No. 24040618 BUSTAMANTE, P.C. 54 Rainey Street, No. 721 Austin, Texas 78701 Tel. 512.940.3753 Fax. 512.551.3773 Email:jmb@BustamanteLegal.com Kip Glasscock Texas State Bar No. 08011000 KIP GLASSCOCK P.C. 550 Fannin, Suite 1350 Beaumont, TX 77701 Tel: (409) 833-8822 Fax: (409) 838-4666 Email: email@example.com
Marc A. Fenster, CA Bar No. 181067 CA Bar No. 181067 firstname.lastname@example.org Andrew Weiss CA Bar No. 232974 email@example.com Adam Hoffman CA Bar No. 218740 firstname.lastname@example.org RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90025 (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 (fax) Patrick R. Anderson PATRICK R. ANDERSON PLLC 4225 Miller Rd, Bldg. B-9, Suite 358 Flint, MI 48507 (810) 275-0751 (248) 928-9239 (fax) email@example.com Debera W. Hepburn, Texas Bar No. 24049568 HEPBURN LAW FIRM PLLC P.O. Box 118218 Carrollton, TX 75011 Telephone: 214/403-4882 Facsimile: 888/205-8791 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Elizabeth A. Wiley Texas State Bar No. 00788666 THE WILEY FIRM PC P.O. Box. 303280 Austin, Texas 78703-3280 Telephone: (512) 420.2387 Facsimile: (512) 551.0028 Email: email@example.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that the foregoing Notice of Plaintiff nXn was served on all counsel of record by the Court's CM/ECF system on this 21st day of December, 2009, whereas the actual motion and exhibits are filed under seal and served only on counsel for Google pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. \s\ Elizabeth A. Wiley Elizabeth A. Wiley
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?