Northeastern University et al v. Google, Inc.,

Filing 139

NOTICE of Disclosure by Jarg Corporation, Northeastern University OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S PRE-TRIAL DISCLOSURES (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Objections to Google's Deposition Designations, # 2 Exhibit B - Objections to Google's Exhibit List)(Glauser, Nicole)

Download PDF
Northeastern University et al v. Google, Inc., Doc. 139 Att. 1 ATTACHMENT A: PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS Dockets.Justia.com LEGEND OF OBJECTIONS "A" "B" "C" "D" Lack of authenticity, FED. R. EVID. 901. Not the best evidence, FED. R. EVID. 1002-1004 & 1006. Cumulative, FED. R. EVID. 402 & 403. Subject to a filed/anticipated Daubert motion or motion to exclude. Duplicative. Hearsay, FED. R. EVID. 801-803. Incomplete (necessary additional testimony noted), FED. R. EVID. 106. Improper opinion testimony from lay witness, FED. R. EVID. 701 & 702. Illegible. Lack of foundation or lack of personal knowledge, FED. R. EVID. 602. Lack scientific reliability, FED. R. EVID. 702 & 703. Multiple documents. Subject to a filed/anticipated Motion in Limine. Subject to a filed/anticipated Motion for (Partial) Summary Judgment. Not properly identified on Defendant's trial exhibit list. Not Relevant, FED. R. EVID. 402. Physical exhibit to which Plaintiffs reserve right to object following exchange of same in accordance with agreement among the parties. Privileged/attorney work-product. Probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice; confusion of issues; waste of time; considerations of undue delay; misleading nature of exhibit or testimony; needless presentation of cumulative evidence, FED. R. EVID. 402 & 403. Not timely produced. Offer of settlement/settlement negotiations, FED. R. EVID. 408. "Dup." "H" "I" "IO" "Ill" - "LF" "LS" "M" - "ML" "MSJ" "NI" - "NR" "P" - "Priv." "PV" - "T" - "408" - - 2- Dr. Kenneth Baclawski (August 27, 2009) Defendant's Plaintiffs' Designation Objection 7:2-6 53:2-13 ML 57:2-58:6 NR, ML, MSJ 73:22-75:12 LF, NR, PV, H 81:10-25 I (82:1-5) 83:3-9 I (83:10-17) 83:18-84:19 96:16-24 LF, NR, PV 135:18-23 LF, NR, ML, MSJ 135:25-136:9 LF, NR, ML, MSJ 137:11-19 LF, NR, PV, ML 144:19-145:5 I (145:6-9), NR, ML, MSJ, IO, D 145:15-19 NR, MSJ 151:12-24 - 3- Dr. Kenneth Baclawski (December 13, 2010) Defendant's Plaintiffs' Designation Objection 6:1-3 I (6:16-17) 12:5-13:3 I (9:25-11:3) 13:10-20 15:11-15 I (14:24-15:10) 45:19-46:9 56:13-58:10 NR, ML, MSJ 70:2-19 NR 90:22-93:16 I (93:17-94:7), NR 94:21-95:15 I (94:8-20), NR 97:5-15 103:2-14 I (103:15-104:2) , ML, MSJ 104:3-105:4 LF, NR, PV, ML, MSJ 105:19-107:14 I (105:16-18; 107:15-22), NR, ML, MSJ 116:14-117:5 IO, LF, NR, ML, MSJ 117:9-12 I (117:13-18), NR, ML, MSJ 117:19-118:25 I (117:13-18), NR, ML, MSJ 119:5-22 NR, ML, MSJ, I (119:23-121:13) 136:8-11 I (135:25-136:7), IO, LF, NR, PV 142:19-143:19 LF, NR, IO, ML, MSJ 143:21-144:11 LF, NR, IO, MSJ 160:23-161:9 LF, NR, PV, ML - 4- Michael Belanger (July 15 & 16, 2010) Defendant's Plaintiffs' Designation Objection 6:5-8 18:4-16 19:7-18 H 27:3-22 31:14-20 I (31:12-13), NR 49:18-50:5 56:21-57:4 61:5-22 NR 62:2-12 102:4-8 I (102:9-12), NR 102:20-21 I (102:13-18), LF, NR 103:12-20 104:1-23 121:19-122:1 NR, PV, IO, LF 127:19-128:5 NR 134:21-135:19 NR 146:1-18 NR 168:5-12 NR 174:13-19 I (173:10-14), H 175:8-14 NR, H 176:8-14 I (176:6-7), LF, NR, PV 176:16-17 I (176:6-7), LF, NR, PV, H 189:19-190:3 NR 190:9-19 I (190:4-8), H 192:1-11 LF, NR, PV 213:17-214:1 NR 214:10-215:10 IO, LF, NR, PV 239:1-23 NR 240:14-20 NR 240:24-241:18 NR - 5- Dr. Urs Hoelzle (November 4, 2010) Defendant's Plaintiffs' Designation Objection 6:8-12 I (194:8-17) 9:15-22 11:15-22 20:25-21:3 21:16-20 29:7-27:17 I, NI 47:18-49:13 49:24-50:15 51:4-53:13 I (53:14-23), NR, PV, H 87:14-88:25 I (89:1-4), H 134:4-135:6 I (132:7-14) 144:16-24 I(142:12-144:15) 147:10-149:24 I (146:4-5, 147:7-9) 159:7-160:8 I (157:15-159:6) 162:24-164:12 - 6- Dr. Cosmos Nicolaou (October 18, 2010) Defendant's Plaintiffs' Designation Objection 11:3-6 20:25-21:13 24:5-8 NR 24:11-22 NR 25:16-18 NR 25:20-26:2 NR 29:10-30:5 LF, NR, PV 30:15-31:7 32:6-34:2 35:7-36:4 38:4-11 I (38:12-17) 38:18-21 42:9-23 46:14-24 56:8-21 58:17-59:21 NR, LF, PV 60:4-61:16 62:8-63:16 83:6-84:11 88:22-89:4 NR, PV, LF 112:2-23 I (112:1) 132:15-133:7 I (132:4-14) 137:9-138:5 LF, NR, PV 152:24-153:12 158:22-159:17 NR, LF, NR, PV 175:17-21 LF, NR, PV, H 185:14-21 I (185:22-25) 187:22-188:10 225:8-226:3 I (223:5-7), LF, NR, PV, NR 246:10-247:5 NR, LF, NR, PV 263:21-264:16 NR, H, LF, NR, PV 266:20-268:6 278:19-283:24 NR (279:17-280:9), H (279:17-280:9), LF (279:17-280:9), PV (279:17-280:9), LF (281:1-282:4), PV (281:1-282:4) - 7- Dr. Anna Lynn Patterson (October 13, 2010) Defendant's Plaintiffs' Designation Objection 10:10-2 I (10:10-12) 11:25-12;10 24:5-7 28:13-18 28:21-22 28:24-29:11 LF (29:9-11), PV(29:9-11), H (29:9-11), I (29:12-19) 30:9-11 I (29:23-30:8) 30:14-31 NR, PV, LF 31:16-18 31:24-32:2 NR, PV, LF 32:5-8 46:22-25 48:3-6 52:24-53:6 NR, PV, LF, H 72:13-14 72:16 NR, PV, LF, H 72:18-24 NR, PV, LF, H 73:1 NR, PV, LF, H 73:3-14 NR, PV, LF, H 73:16-17 NR, PV, LF, H 84:20-85:2 NR, PV, LF 85:4-7 NR, PV, LF 85:9-13 NR, PV, LF 89:11-17 I (87:8-9, 88:16-17), LF, NR, PV, H 124:21-23 I (124:17-20) 124:25-125:2 128:11-25 LF, NR, PV 129:3-9 LF, NR, PV, H 140:4-6 NR 140:8-14 NR 140:17-20 140:22 140:24-25 NR 141:2-4 NR, NR, PV, LF, I (141:6-9) 171:25-172:9 NR, PV, LF, H - 8- David Roache (May 25, 2010) Defendant's Plaintiffs' Designation Objection 6:12-14 17:2-5 20:12-21:22 H 30:16-18 31:1-10 31:19:21 34:1-3 36:13-37:2 50:22-51:13 52:11-24 54:21-55:7 55:20-56:1 57:18-58:3 I (57:4-14, 58:4-5) 62:9-23 63:4-5 78:24-79:9 83:17-19 84:22-85:16 90:24-91:20 I (90:23) 95:9-97:11 101:14-102:1 I (101:1-5) 102:15-103:19 LF(103:9-19) 105:18-106:8 I (106:9-107:8) 120:22-121:5 122:1-3 LF, I (122:4-123:13) 123:20-124:8 124:24-125:9 LF (125:5-9) 128:3-13 128:20-129:8 140:7-10 140:22-141:3 144:20-145:1 153:16-154:13 I (154:14-155:6) 155:6-11 156:1-10 156:12-157:6 LF (156:12-18) 164:12-165:22 173:14-174:16 LF (174:10-18) 174:18 176:17-22 - 9- Defendant's Designation 176:24-177:2 182:22-183:5 242:7-16 242:18-20 248:19-249:8 249:14-24 250:21-251:17 256:6-8 256:10-13 256:15-20 257:1-10 261:10-262:14 Plaintiffs' Objection LF LF I (250:18-19) - 10- Shalom Wertsberger (September 28, 2010) Defendant's Plaintiffs' Designation Objection 5:12-15 8:8-13 8:24-9:19 LF (9:11-9:13) 10:1-24 11:10-16 I (11:8-9) 12:14-23 NR 15:12-18 16:18-17:2 17:16-23 I (17:3-4, 17:24-18:19) 25:9-26:2 26:10-19 29:10-19 30:1-31:7 31:14-18 I (31:19-21) 34:11-23 36:2-3 36:21-25 37:3-8 37:19-25 38:6-39:7 I (39:12-15) 42:21-43:5 43:19-23 I (44:5-12) 52:1-12 LF 54:17-55:12 55:25-56:23 LF (56:6-18) 57:20-58:1 NR (57:20-58:1) 58:22-61:8 LF (60:21-61:8) 73:7-74:17 LF (74:4-17) 77:18-78:2 79:11-18 H, LF, I (74:4-17) 80:6-11 LF (80:6-9) - 11- Dr. Yonatan Zunger (August 20, 2009) Defendant's Plaintiffs' Designation Objection 6:10-12 7:10-13 8:20-9:12 9:24-10:8 10:18-11:2 12:10-18 12:20-14:3 LF, NR, PV, H 14:7-10 20:17-23 21:18-20 21:23-22:7 42:7-11 108:8-109:1 LF, NR, PV, H, NR 151:3-152:16 I (148:14-16) 153:8-154:8 155:4-17 I(154:9-155:3), NR, NR, PV - 12- Kaustuv (December 3, 2010) Defendant's Plaintiffs' Designation Objection 6:7-10 10:8-24 16:13-17:8 20:5-6 20:8-13 21:19-22:3 I (22:4-6, 22:8) 38:11-12 38:14-25 I (39:12-16) 43:6-16 48:3-21 54:21-23 54:25-55:7 58:11-12 58:14-59:1 59:3-9 59:11-13 91:11-92:7 93:4-7 93:9-94:3 118:20-22 118:24-120:8 - 13- Melvin Bernstein (January 18, 2011) Defendant's Plaintiffs' Designation Objection 5:12-15 27:13-20 NR 28:18-25 NR 57:5-8 58:4-7 LF 58:9-13 LF 60:15-17 62:4-8 LF 62:10-11 LF 70:5-11 84:2-10 88:17-19 LF 88:21-89:5 LF 89:7-10 LF, H - 14- Vincent Lembo (February 15, 2011) Defendant's Plaintiffs' Designation Objection 4:10-13 7:14-23 NR, LF 9:17-22 16:13-17:9 26:10-27:4 LF(27:3-4) 30:24-31:4 43:3-14 49:20-50:6 59:12-18 72:3-11 403, NR 75:21-23 76:2-8 77:7-8 LF 77:10-20 LF(77:10-16) - 15-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?