Northeastern University et al v. Google, Inc.,
Filing
161
NOTICE by Jarg Corporation, Northeastern University OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.S AMENDED WITNESS LIST,COUNTER EXHIBIT LIST, AND COUNTER-DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Objections to Counter Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit B - Objections to Counter Designations)(Glauser, Nicole)
Northeastern University et al v. Google, Inc.,
Doc. 161 Att.
EXHIBIT B: PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS
Dockets.Justia.com
LEGEND OF OBJECTIONS "A" "AT" "B" "C" "D" Lack of authenticity, FED. R. EVID. 901. Improper attorney testimony/argument at deposition. Not the best evidence, FED. R. EVID. 1002-1004 & 1006. Cumulative, FED. R. EVID. 402 & 403. Subject to a filed/anticipated Daubert motion or motion to exclude. Duplicative. Hearsay, FED. R. EVID. 801-803. Incomplete (necessary additional testimony noted), FED. R. EVID. 106. Improper opinion testimony from lay witness, FED. R. EVID. 701 & 702. Illegible. Lack of foundation or lack of personal knowledge, FED. R. EVID. 602. Lack scientific reliability, FED. R. EVID. 702 & 703. Multiple documents. Subject to a filed/anticipated Motion in Limine. Subject to a filed/anticipated Motion for (Partial) Summary Judgment. Not properly identified on Defendant's trial exhibit list. Not Relevant, FED. R. EVID. 402. Physical exhibit to which Plaintiffs reserve right to object following exchange of same in accordance with agreement among the parties. Privileged/attorney work-product. Probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice; confusion of issues; waste of time; considerations of undue delay; misleading nature of exhibit or testimony; needless presentation of cumulative evidence, FED. R. EVID. 402 & 403. Not timely produced. Offer of settlement/settlement negotiations, FED. R. EVID. 408.
"Dup." "H" "I" "IO" "Ill" -
"LF" "LS" "M" -
"ML" "MSJ" "NI" -
"NR" "P" -
"Priv." "PV" -
"T"
-
"408" -
BILL COUGHRAN (February 4, 2011) Google's CounterDesignation 11:1-9 18:12-19 19:2-5, 7-16 23:5-9 24:16-18 25:5-13 27:8-10 29:23-30:1 33:25-34:2 34:25-35:4 37:13-16 38:10-13 45:1-4 51:5-10 53:17-54:6 56:17-57:8 61:8-11 65:9-17 70:25-71:3 71:5-12 82:25-83:7 84:5-15 86:22-24 92:18-19 107:12-24 108:13-21 121:17-19 129:15-23 134:5-12 136:4-13 Plaintiffs' Objection I (11:14-17)
LF, NR, AT LF, NR, I (27:11-13) LF, NR, I (30:13-18)
LF, NR, I (71:2272:1, 72:4-6)
NR, I (92:20-21)
AT NR
SUNIL DALUVOY (December 7, 2010) Google's CounterDesignation 16:16-17:1 18:20-22 19:12-23 30:18-23 35:7-36:3 37:5-12 38:10-39:4 60:4-11 66:10-24 67:4-8 67:10-68:13 99:3-23 107:2-4 153:17-154:23 161:5-11 Plaintiffs' Objection NR, PV
NR, I (66:25-67:3) NR NR NR
DR. JEFFREY DEAN (November 2, 2010) Google's CounterDesignation 10:19-22 11:4-6 11:13 12:1-3 12:19-20 13:1-3 13:10 24:7-9 29:17-21 36:18-20 49:17-50:25 114:4-12 115:1-6 115:19-24 117:13-118:1 118:17-19 118:21-119:3 157:6-18 158:7-10 Plaintiffs' Objection NR, PV, AT NR, PV, AT NR, PV, AT NR, PV, AT NR, PV, AT NR, PV, AT NR, PV, AT
LF, PV
NR, LF, PV LF, PV LF, PV
DR. NADAV EIRON (May 12, 2010) Google's CounterDesignation 26:16-20 27:9-14 66:8-67:4 68:4-5 73:17-74:3 75:1-8 79:1-7 79:23-80:9 105:10-17 106:3-22 114:14-18 118:7-10 123:9-12 130:19-131:4 134:10-18 170:20-24 171:10-14 225:1-18 242:12-25 255:8-14 257:23-24 258:1-15 273:3-18 273:22-274:6 274:13-17 Plaintiffs' Objection
NR, PV
LF, PV, NR, I (75:9-23)
NR NR
LF, PV, NR H, NR, LF, PV IO, ML, NR, PV PV, NR, IO, JL
NR
DR. URS HOELZLE (November 4, 2010) Google's CounterDesignation 33:23-36:14 36:16-37:17 51:4-53:13 105:15-24 106:3-16 Plaintiffs' Objection LF, PV, NR, H LF, PV, NR, H LF, PV, NR, H LF, PV, NR
KAUSTUV (December 3, 2010) Google's CounterDesignation 7:21-23 38:3-6 92:25-93:3 100:3-14 136:16-19 153:1-6 Plaintiffs' Objection
NR, PV, AT
DR. COSMOS NICOLAOU (October 18, 2010) Google's CounterDesignation 28:14-16 28:18-20 46:5-11 49:10-13 69:16-25 96:1-12 106:11-18 117:18-118:7 129:6-20 131:3-7 131:16-19 138:12-16 186:16-19 196:1-10 213:17-20 223:20-25 268:6-20 274:9-12 Plaintiffs' Objection
LF, NR, I LF, NR, I (70:1-6)
NR, I
I (224:1-5)
DR. ANNA PATTERSON (October 13, 2010) Google's CounterDesignations 38:8-10 42:19-22 46:16-21 55:22-56:22 57:15-17 57:18-20 58:2-18 62:25-63:5 69:12-15 70:25-71:2 71:12-21 93:11-15 93:20-21 108:13-18 113:15-16 113:18-22 115:10-12 128:8-9 137:2-10 137:24-138:5 167:4-168:2 Plaintiffs' Objection
LF, PV, NR NR LF, PV, NR
LF, PV, NR LF, NR, PV LF, PV LF, PV, NR NR NR
H, LF, PV, NR, I 137:24-2 = no obj. 138:3-5 = NR, PV, I LF, PV, NR
DAVID ROACHE (May 25, 2010) Google's CounterDesignation 82:16-19 84:19-21 287:25-288:4 290:11-16 296:16-23 297:2-9 298:8-16 Plaintiffs' Objection NR
LF, I (290:17-22)
ANTHONY TOMASIC (May 5, 2010) Google's CounterDesignation 22:20-23:7 31:9-32:16 40:8-41:5 45:8-23 46:14-47:17 54:13-54:13 54:17-20 57:8-24 64:20-24 71:7-14 79:1-6 84:8-19 100:16-101:9 105:17-106:17 108:9-13 113:21-114:10 122:10-14 125:4-126:2 127:15-18 128:7-12 131:3-8 137:18 151:25-152:11 159:25-160:1 Plaintiffs' Objection
NR, LF, PV, IO, D LF, PV IO, NR I (53:25-54:12), NR I (54:14-16), NR
NR NR, LF, PV
NR NR LF, PV LF, PV LF, PV LF, PV D
SHALOM WERTSBERGER (September 28, 2010) Google's CounterDesignation 93:2-22 93:25-94:3 Plaintiffs' Objection NR, PV NR, PV
DR. YONATAN ZUNGER (August 20, 2009) Google's CounterDesignation 21:14-17 29:8-9 43:10 68:14-24 71:17-19 81:12-20 81:25-82:8 95:11-14 115:5-21114:7 117:17-23 118:11-17 123:15-19 124:5-9 129:9-19 141:2-7 162:17-21 164:18-19 Plaintiffs' Objection
LF, PV, NR
ML, LF, PV, IO I (118:6-7), NR NR, LF, PV, IO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?