Northeastern University et al v. Google, Inc.,

Filing 45

NOTICE of Disclosure by Google, Inc., Under P.R. 3-3 and 3-4 (Wolff, Jason)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY and JARG CORPORATION Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC. Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-486-CE GOOGLE INC'S NOTICE OF DISCLOSURES UNDER P.R. 3-3 AND 3-4 Google Inc. hereby gives notice that it has complied with Patent Local Rule 3-3 and 3-4 by serving Plaintiff's counsel with Google Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions and documents. GOOGLE INC.'S INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS 1 Dated: November 7, 2008 Respectfully submitted, FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: /s/ Jason W. Wolff Michael E. Jones (SBN 10929400) POTTER MINTON A Professional Corporation 110 N. College, Suite 500 Tyler, TX 75702 Telephone: (903) 597-8311 Facsimile: (903) 593-0846 Ruffin B. Cordell (SBN 04820550) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 1425 K Street, N.W., 11th Floor Washington, DC 20005-3500 Telephone: (202) 783-5070 Facsimile: (202) 783-2331 Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 678-5070 Facsimile: (858) 678-5099 Howard G. Pollack (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Shelley K. Mack (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Jerry T. Yen (CA SBN 247988) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: (650) 839-5070 Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. Notice of Disclosures v2.doc GOOGLE INC.'S INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on November 7, 2008, a true and correct copy of GOOGLE INC'S NOTICE OF DISCLOSURES UNDER P.R. 3-3 AND 3-4 was served on all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court's CM/ECF system pursuant to Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). /s/ Jason W. Wolff JASON W. WOLFF Notice of Disclosures v2.doc GOOGLE INC.'S INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?