Northeastern University et al v. Google, Inc.,

Filing 56

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (for Additional Disclosures) by Northeastern University, Jarg Corporation, Google, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stout, Stephen)

Download PDF
Northeastern University et al v. Google, Inc., Doc. 56 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY and JARG CORPORATION Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE, INC. Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-CV-486-CE JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES Plaintiffs Northeastern University and Jarg Corporation ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Google Inc. ("Google") hereby jointly move this Court for an extension of time for the deadline to produce all liability related documents. Counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendant have conferred and have agreed upon a mutually agreeable date. As set forth in the Court's August 21, 2008 Discovery Order, by May 8, 2009, "[e]ach party, without awaiting a discovery request, shall provide, to the extent not already provided, to every other party . . . a copy of all documents, electronically stored information, and tangible things in the possession, custody, or control of the party that are relevant to liability related issues.". Dkt. No. 82. The parties seek a one month extension--until June 5, 2009--of that deadline. Both parties have been cooperating to aid in the identification of liability related materials and have made substantial progress in their production. The requested extension will not affect other dates in the Court's Docket Control Order or Discovery Order. Good cause exists for this Motion, and this Motion is not sought for purposes of delay. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Dated: May 8, 2009 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Stephen C. Stout William B. Dawson (Tx Bar No. 05603600) VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P. 3700 Trammel Crow Center 3001 Ross Avenue Dallas, Texas 75201-2975 Tel: (214) 220-7926 Fax: (214) 999-7926 E-mail: bdawson@velaw.com David B. Weaver (TX Bar No. 00798576) Christopher V. Ryan (TX Bar No. 24037412) Michael Valek (TX Bar No.24044028) R. Floyd Walker (TX Bar No. 24044751) Stephen C. Stout (TX Bar No. 24060672) Meredith J. Fitzpatrick (TX Bar No. 24059753) VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P. 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78746 Tel: (512) 542-8400 Fax: (512) 236-3338 E-mail: dweaver@velaw.com cryan@velaw.com mvalek@velaw.com fwalker@velaw.com sstout@velaw.com mfitzpatrick@velaw.com Otis W Carroll, Jr. (TX Bar No. 03895700) Collin Maloney (TX Bar No. 00794219) IRELAND CARROLL & KELLEY 6101 S Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, TX 75703 Tel: (903) 561-1600 Fax: (903) 581-1071 Email: Fedserv@icklaw.com Counsel for Plaintiffs Northeastern University and Jarg Corporation 2 /s/ Jason W. Wolff (by permission) Michael E. Jones (TX Bar No. 10929400) POTTER MINTON 110 N. College, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75702 Tel: (903) 597-8311 Fax: (903) 593-0846 mikejones@potterminton.com Ruffin B. Cordell (TX Bar No. 04820550) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 1425 K Street, N.W., 11th Floor Washington, DC 20005-3500 Tel: (202) 783-5070 Fax: (202) 783-2331 cordell@fr.com Jason W. Wolff Francis Albert FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, California 92130 Tel: (858) 678-5070 Fax: (858) 678-5099 wolff@fr.com Howard G. Pollack (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Shelley Kay Mack (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Jerry T. Yen (CA Bar No. 247899) Enrique D. Duarte FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Tel: 650.839.5070 Fax: 650.839.5071 pollack@fr.com mack@fr.com yen@fr.com Counsel for Defendant Google, Inc. 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on May 8, 2009. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail on this same date. /s/ Stephen C. Stout Stephen C. Stout 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?