Northeastern University et al v. Google, Inc.,
Filing
99
ORDER granting 98 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. expert reports are due 15 days after the claim construction ruling is entered, or on December 15, 2010, whichever date is later. Rebuttal expert reports are due 30 days after the claim construction order is entered, or on January 6, 2011, whichever date is later. All discovery shall be completed on or before February 11, 201. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 10/25/10. (ehs, )
Northeastern University et al v. Google, Inc.,
Doc. 99
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY and JARG CORPORATION Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE, INC. Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-CV-486-CE
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR EXPERT REPORTS AND DISCOVERY DEADLINE Before the Court is plaintiffs Northeastern University and Jarg Corporation ("Northeastern and Jarg") and defendant Google Inc.'s ("Google") Joint Motion to Extend Time for Expert Reports and Discovery Deadline. After careful consideration of the facts, including the fact that this is a joint motion by all parties, and that the motion will not adversely affect the Court's schedule, the Court is of the opinion the Joint Motion to Extend Time for Expert Reports and Discovery Deadline should be GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that expert reports are due 15 days after the claim construction ruling is entered, or on December 15, 2010, whichever date is later. It is FURTHER ORDERED that rebuttal expert reports are due 30 days after the claim construction order is entered, or on January 6, 2011, whichever date is later. It is FURTHER ORDERED that all discovery shall be completed on or before February 11, 2011. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dockets.Justia.com
SIGNED this 25th day of October, 2010.
___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?