Microlinc, LLC v. Intel Corporatioh et al

Filing 4

Attachment 1
Consent MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Microlinc, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Carroll, Otis)

Download PDF
Microlinc, LLC v. Intel Corporatioh et al Doc. 4 Att. 1 Case 2:07-cv-00488-TJW Document 4 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MICROLINC, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, ACER INC., a Taiwan Corporation, ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, a California Corporation, ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, APPLE INC., a California Corporation, DELL INC., a Delaware Corporation, GATEWAY INC., a Delaware Corporation, HEWLETT-PACKARD CO., a Delaware Corporation, LENOVO GROUP LTD., a Hong Kong Corporation, LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC., a Delaware Corporation, NVIDIA CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SONY CORPORATION, a Japan Corporation, Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-488 (TJW) TRIAL BY JURY DEMANDED Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00488-TJW Document 4 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 2 of 2 SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a Japan Corporation, SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a New York Corporation, SONY ELECTRONICS INC., a Delaware Corporation, SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC., a California Corporation, TOSHIBA CORP., a Japan Corporation, TOSHIBA AMERICA INC., a Delaware Corporation, TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC., a California Corporation, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF MICROLINC, LLC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL On this date came for consideration Plaintiff Microlinc, LLC's Unopposed Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel. The Court being of the opinion that same should be GRANTED, it is therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff Microlinc, LLC's Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel be and hereby is GRANTED, and that Otis W. Carroll is no longer counsel of record for Plaintiff Microlinc, LLC in this matter.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?