IP Innovation LLC et al v. Google, Inc.

Filing 106

MOTION Joint Motion to Permit Parties to Conduct Depositions After January 15, 2010 by Google, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Beck, David)

IP Innovation LLC et al v. Google, Inc.

Doc. 106

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
IP INNOVATION L.L.C. AND
$ $
$ $

TECHNOLOGY LICENSING

CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs,
V.

GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.

$ CASE NO. 2:07CV-503-RRR $ $ ruRY TRIAL REQUESTED
$ $ $

JOINT MOTION TO PERMIT PARTIES TO CONDUCT DEPOSITIONS AFTER JANUARY 15.2010

TO THE HONORABLE ruDGE OF THIS COURT:

Plaintiffs IP Innovation L.L.C. and Technology Licensing Corporation ("Plaintiffs") and
Defendant Google Inc. ("Defendant") file this joint motion and respectfully ask the Court to

permit

i

them to take depositions in this matter after the January 15,z}I}discovery cutoff. Plaintiffs and Defendant would show the Court as follows:
1

.

At the December 30, 2009 status conference, the Court set January

15

, 2010 as the

deadline to finish all discovery, including depositions.

2.

Plaintiffs and Defendant will be unable to complete all the outstanding

depositions by that date. Plaintiffs and Defendant have therefore agreed to schedule certain depositions after January 15, 2010, and respectfully ask this Court to permit this

scheduling
,,

modification.

3.

Plaintiffs and Defendarftarc working on scheduling in good faith.

The outstanding depositions include: Norman Balder, W. Bruce Croft, Julie L. Davis, Peter

Martin, Tal Lavian, Joseph Gemini, Stu Card, the Plaintiffs' respective Rule 30(b)(6) designees,

USIDOCS 7414633v1

Dockets.Justia.com

and Google's Rule 30(bX6) designees on certain topics concerning licensing, marketing as to the

Google Search Appliance, and document collection and retention.

4.
this request.

Plaintiffs and Defendant seek this extension of time not for delay but for good

cause and that justice may be served. No other deadlines in this matter would be modified by

5.
reports.

By requesting this scheduling modification, neither party agrees, and rather each

party reserves all rights to supplement and/or object to the supplementation

of

any expert

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendant request that the Court permit the parties to
conduct depositions in this matter after the January 15,2010 discovery cutoff.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 14,2010
By: /si David J. Beck

David J. Beck Texas Bar No. 00000070 [e-mail] Michael E. Richardson Texas Bar No. 24002838 mrichardson@brsfirm. com Becr, RnooBN & SBcnBsr, L.L.P. One Houston Center l22l McKirurey St., Suite 4500 Houston, TX. 77010 (7t3) 9sr-3700 (713) 9sl-3720 (Fax)

Mark G. Matuschak (admiuedpro hac vice) Wrr.vrBR CUTT,BnPTcKERTNGHALE AND Donn LLP
60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 (617) s26-6000 (617) s26-s000 (Fax)

US1DOCS 7414633v1

John M. Hintz(admittedpro hac vice) Victor F. Souto (admiuedpro hac vice) Ross E. Firsenbaum (admittedpro hac vice) Wrlvren Curlen PTcKERTNG HALE AND Donn LLP 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022

Qr2)230-8800 (2r2)230-8888 (Fax)
Elizabeth Rogers Brannen (admittedpro hac vice) Arura T. Lee (admitfedpro høc vice) Wu,vBR Cuu,BnPrcKERrNGHer.n ew¡ Donn LLP 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA94304 (6s0) 8s8-6042 (6s0) 8s8-6100 (FaÐ

ArronNnys FoR DEFENDANT ANn
CouNrnn-Cr,arn l Pr,¿,rNrmr Goocr,B INc.

Dated: January 14,2010

Respectfully submitted,

By:/s/ Raymond P. Niro
Raymond P. Niro Joseph N. Hosteny Arthur A. Gasey Paul C. Gibbons Douglas M. Hall David J. Mahalek NIRO, SCAVONE, HALLER & NIRO 181 West Madison, Suite 4600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

T. John V/ard Ward & Smith 111 W. Tyler St. Longview, Texas 75601 Telephone: [phone] Toll Free [phone] Facsimile: (903) 7 57 -2323

USIDOCS 7414633v1

Eric M. Albritton [e-mail] Attorney atLaw P.O. Box2649 Longview, TX75606 Telephone: [phone] Facisimile: [phone]

Arronxnys

FoR Pr.arxrrrrs A¡ID CouxrnR-Cr.¿.rvl DnrnNorNTS IP IxxovarroN L.L.C. AND TncnNor,ocy LrcnxslNc CoRpoRATIoN

CERTIFICATE OF' SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(aX3XA).

/s/ Michael E. Richardson Michael E. Richardson

USIDOCS 74t4633v1