IP Innovation LLC et al v. Google, Inc.

Filing 63

ORDER denying 62 Motion for Extension of Time to File. As the parties did not submit the name of an agreed technical advisor, the Court is considering appointing Michael T. McLemore to the position. The Court ORDERS the parties tofile any objections they have to Mr. McLemore no later than August 7, 2009.. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 7/30/09. (ehs, )

IP Innovation LLC et al v. Google, Inc.

Doc. 63

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IP INNOVATION, LLC, and TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORPORATION Plaintiffs vs. GOOGLE, INC. Defendant

§ § § § § § § § § § §

CASE NO. 2:07 CV 503 PATENT CASE

ORDER The Court DENIES the parties' joint motion to extend the claim construction briefing deadlines (Docket No. 62). The parties' motion would extend the briefing deadlines such that the reply brief is due the same week as the claim construction hearing is set. This will not allow the Court adequate time to review the parties' briefs. As the parties did not submit the name of an agreed technical advisor, the Court is considering appointing Michael T. McLemore to the position. The Court ORDERS the parties to file any objections they have to Mr. McLemore no later than August 7, 2009.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 30th day of July, 2009.

__________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com