Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 176

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery Joint Motion for Plaintiff and Defendants IAC Search and Media and Lycos, Inc. to Extend Certain Scheduling Deadlines by IAC Search & Media, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Maloney, Collin)

Download PDF
Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 176 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC v. GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., AOL, LLC, AND LYCOS, INC. JOINT MOTION TO FURTHER EXTEND CERTAIN SCHEDULING DEADLINES Come now Plaintiff Software Rights Archive, LLC and Defendants IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Lycos, Inc. and file this Joint Motion to Further Extend Certain Scheduling Deadlines, and in support of same would show the Court as follows: 1. Plaintiff Software Rights Archive, LLC and Defendants IAC Search & Media, Civil Case No. 2:07-cv-511 (CE) Inc. and Lycos, Inc. have reached agreement to extend certain scheduling deadlines in this matter. The current deadlines and the agreed to extended deadlines appear in the below chart: EVENT CURRENT DEADLINE (Defendants IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Lycos, Inc.) November 30, 2009 AGREED TO EXTENDED DEADLINE (Defendants IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Lycos, Inc.) January 6, 2010 Deadline for Document Production under paragraph 3(b) of September 12, 2008 Discovery Order (Dkt. No. 82), as extended in Dkt. No. 172. As reflected in Dkt. No. 127, Source Code will not be included by Defendants in this production. 02904.51330/3215046.2 1 Dockets.Justia.com EVENT CURRENT DEADLINE (All Defendants) Plaintiff will determine which January 8, 2010 of Defendants' modules (or portions of Defendants' systems), if any, contain Source Code that it contends in good faith should be produced. Plaintiff will identify these modules (or portions of Defendants' systems) in writing to Defendants on or before January 8, 2010. Plaintiff's identification of modules (or portions of Defendants' systems) shall not constitute an admission as to which modules (or portions of Defendants' systems) are relevant to the case, but rather shall merely identify the modules (or portions of Defendants' systems) as to which, as of that date, Plaintiff believes in good faith it needs access to Source Code. Defendants reserve the right to object to any such identification from Plaintiff. At that time, the parties will attempt in good faith to agree on reasonable limits as to the manner, location, and quantity with regard to printing of any of the production. Nothing herein shall preclude Plaintiff from seeking further discovery relating to Defendants' Source Code or shall obligate Defendants to acquiesce to such discovery. Nothing in this Order shall obligate the 02904.51330/3215046.2 AGREED TO EXTENDED DEADLINE (Defendants IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Lycos, Inc.) February 8, 2010 2 EVENT CURRENT DEADLINE (All Defendants) AGREED TO EXTENDED DEADLINE (Defendants IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Lycos, Inc.) parties to produce or relieve the parties from producing any Source Code or constitute an admission that any particular source code or object code is, or is not, discoverable. (Dkt. No. 166) 2. This case is still in its relatively early stages, and the above agreed to extended deadlines will not adversely affect any other of the Court's deadlines. For example, jury selection is not scheduled to occur until May 2, 2011. This Motion is not sought for delay, but that justice might be done. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Software Rights Archive, LLC and Defendants IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Lycos, Inc. jointly and respectfully request that the above deadlines be further extended as agreed to by these parties as set forth in the above chart. Dated: November [ ], 2009 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Lee L. Kaplan (by permission) Lee L. Kaplan LEAD ATTORNEY State Bar No. 11094400 SMYSER KAPLAN & VESELKA, L.L.P. 700 Louisiana, Suite 2300 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 221-2323 (713) 221-2320 (fax) lkaplan@skv.com 02904.51330/3215046.2 3 Victor G. Hardy State Bar No. 00790821 (Requesting Admission Pro Hac Vice) Andrew G. DiNovo State Bar No. 00790594 Adam G. Price State Bar No. 24027750 Jay D. Ellwanger State Bar No. 24036522 DINOVO PRICE ELLWANGER LLP P.O. Box 201690 Austin, Texas 78720 (512) 681-4060 (512) 628-3410 (fax) vhardy@dpelaw.com Of counsel: S. Calvin Capshaw State Bar No. 03783900 Elizabeth L. DeRieux State Bar No. 05770585 CAPSHAW DERIEUX 1127 Judson Road, Suite 220 P.O. Box 3999 Longview, TX 75606-3999 (903) 236-9800 (903) 236-8787 (fax) ccapshaw@capshawlaw.com Robert M. Parker State Bar No. 15498000 Robert C. Bunt State Bar No. 00787165 Charles Ainsworth State Bar No. 0078352 PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C. 100 East Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 (903) 531-3535 (903) 533-9687 (fax) Attorneys for Plaintiff SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC 02904.51330/3215046.2 4 By: /s/ Jennifer A. Kash (by permission) Claude M. Stern (CA Bar No. 96737) Jennifer A. Kash (CA Bar No. 203679) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 Email: claudestern@quinnemanuel.com Email: jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com Otis Carroll Tex. Bar No. 03895700 Collin Maloney Tex. Bar No. 00794219 IRELAND, CARROLL & KELLEY, P.C. 6101 S. Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75703 Tel: (903) 561-1600 Fax: (903) 581-1071 Email: Fedserv@icklaw.com Attorneys for Defendants IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC. and LYCOS, INC. 02904.51330/3215046.2 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served this [ ]th day of November, 2009, with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). /s/ Collin Maloney Collin Maloney 02904.51330/3215046.2 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?