Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
Filing
189
NOTICE by Yahoo! Inc. regarding Privileged Information Pursuant to Section 5 of the Court's Discovery Order (Jones, Michael)
Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
Doc. 189
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., AOL LLC, and LYCOS, INC., Defendants.
§ § § § § § § § § §
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-CV-511 (CE)
DEFENDANT YAHOO! INC.'S NOTICE RE: PRIVILEGED INFORMATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 5 OF THE COURT'S DISCOVERY ORDER Yahoo! Inc. hereby notifies the Court of its compliance with Section 5 of the Court's September 12, 2008 Discovery Order (Dkt No. 82) relating to privileged information, as modified by the Court's September 28, 2009 and December 7, 2009 Orders (Dkt. Nos. 166 and 184). Dated: December 8, 2009 By: /s/ Richard S.J. Hung
with permission by Michael E. Jones
Michael A. Jacobs (CA Bar No. 111664) Richard S. J. Hung (CA Bar No. 197425) MORRISON & FOERSTER 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415-268-7000 Facsimile: 415-268-7522 Email: mjacobs@mofo.com Email: rhung@mofo.com Michael E. Jones 1
sf-2776482
Dockets.Justia.com
Texas Bar No. 10929400 John F. Bufe Texas Bar No. 03316930 Potter Minton A Professional Corporation 110 North College, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: (903) 597-8311 Facsimile: (903) 593-0846
Email:
mikejones@potterminton.com Attorneys for Defendant YAHOO! INC.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service were served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on the 8th day of December, 2009. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class U.S. mail on this same date. /s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones
2
sf-2776482
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?