Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 231

ORDER granting 229 Motion for Extension of Time to File Sur-Reply to defendants' motion for leave to amend and supplement Invalidity Contentions and Reply supporting Pltf's motion to strike invalidity contentions. Responses due by 3/10/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 2/24/10. (ehs, )

Download PDF
Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 231 IN T H E UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T C O U R T F O R T H E EASTERN DISTRICT O F TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION § § Plaintiff, § § v. § § G O O G L E I N C . , YAHOO! I N C . , § l A C S E A R C H & M E D I A , INC., A O L L L C , § a n d L Y C O S , INC. § § Defendants. .§ . SOFTWARE R I G H T S ARCHIVE, L L C Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-511 (CE) J U R Y T R I A L DEMANDED . O R D E R GRANTING UNOPPOSED M O T I O N F O R EXTENSION T O F I L E CONSOLIDATED S U R - I m P L Y T O DEFENDANTS' M O T I O N F O R L E A V E T O AMEND AND S U P P L E M E N T I N V A L I D I T Y C O N T E N T I O N S AND R E P L Y S U P P O R T I N G P L A I N T I F F ' S M O T I O N T O S T R I K E I N VA L I D I T Y C O N T E N T I O N S Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion for Extension to File Consolidated Sur-Reply to Defendants' Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Invalidity Contentions and Reply· Supporting P l a i n t i f f s Motion to Strike Invalidity Contentions . . Based on the arguments presented in the motion and the Defendants not being opposed, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until March l a , 2010 to file a consolidated Sur-Reply to Defendants' Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Invalidity Contentions and Reply Supporting P l a i n t i f f s Motion to Strike Invalidity Contentions. SIGNED this 24th day of February, 2010. ___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?