Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 268

ORDER granting 266 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Sur-reply is limited to 12 pages, excluding attachments. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 4/28/2010. (ch, )

Download PDF
IN T H E UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T C O U R T F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S T R I C T O F TEXAS M A R S H A L L DIVISION § § Plaintiff, § § v. § § G O O G L E I N C . , YAHOO! I N C . , § l A C S E A R C H & MEDIA, INC., A O L L L C , § a n d L YCOS, I N C . § § Defendants. § SOFTWARE R I G H T S ARCHIVE, L L C Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-511-TJW J U R Y T R I A L DEMANDED O R D E R GRANTING P L A I N T I F F ' S UNOPPOSED M O T I O N F O R (1) AN EXTENSION O F T I M E T O F I L E SUR-REPLY OPPOSING G O O G L E ' S M O T I O N F O R P R O T E C T I O N AND (2) AN INCREASED P A G E L I M I T Before the Court is Plaintiff, Software Rights Archive, LLC's Motion for an Extension o f Time to File Sur-Reply in Opposition to Google's Motion for Protection, filed on April 2, 2010. After considering the Motion and the fact that the Motion is unopposed, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED. Accordingly, it is O R D E R E D that Plaintiff, Software Rights Archive, LLC's Unopposed Motion for an Extension o f Time to File Sur-reply in Opposition to Google's Motion for Protection is GRANTED. O R D E R E D that Plaintiff, Software Rights Archive, LLC's Unopposed Motion to Increase Page Limit for the Sur-reply in Opposition to Google's Motion for Protection is GRANTED. I t is further ORDERED that Plaintiff, Software Rights Archive, L L C ' s shall have until and including May 1 0 , 2 0 1 0 , to file its Sur-reply in opposition to Google's Motion for Protection and the Surreply is limited to 12 pages, excluding attachments. SIGNED this 28th day of April, 2010. ___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?