Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 92

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 66 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Standing by Google Inc., Yahoo! Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., AOL, LLC., Lycos, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Walsh, Thomas)

Download PDF
Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 92 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC v. GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., AOL, LLC, AND LYCOS, INC. DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants Google Inc., Yahoo! Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., AOL, LLC, and Lycos, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants"), through their undersigned counsel, respectfully move this Honorable Court for an unopposed further extension of time to file a reply brief in support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing. In support of their request for an extension, Defendants state as follows: 1. This patent infringement action was commenced on November 21, 2007. The Civil Case No. 2:07-cv-511 (CE) deadlines for the Markman hearing and trial are November 10, 2010 and May 2, 2011, respectively. 2. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing on July 16, 2008 (Docket No. 66). 3. On July 17, 2008, Defendants consented to a request by the Plaintiff, Software Rights Archive, LLC ("SRA"), for an extension for SRA to file its opposition brief. See Docket No. 67. 4. SRA filed its opposition brief on August 25, 2008 (Docket No. 76). Under the Local Rules of this Court, Defendants' Reply Brief would have been due on September 5, 2008. 1 sf-2589901 Dockets.Justia.com 5. On September 3, 2008, the Court granted Defendants' Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time which granted Defendants an extension until and including October 20, 2008 to file their Reply Brief so that Defendants' could conduct jurisdictional discovery on standing issues. (Docket No. 79). 6. Defendants have been conducting jurisdictional discovery on standing issues and in that regard have thus far taken 3 oral depositions and have reviewed and/or obtained voluminous documents by way of subpoena on issues related to standing. As a result, Defendants believe that they need additional time to properly respond to the evidence and arguments raised by SRA in its Opposition and therefore request a further extension from October 20, 2008 until and including November 10, 2008 to file their Reply Brief. 7. This brief additional time requested from October 20, 2008 to November 10, 2008 serves the interests of justice and judicial efficiency since the court' s jurisdiction is a threshold matter. Accordingly, this motion is not for purposes of delay but rather so that justice may be done. 8. The relief requested of a further extension from October 20, 2008 to November 10, 2008 for the filing of Defendants' Reply Brief is not opposed by Plaintiff SRA. WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that they be granted a further extension of time ­ until and including November 10, 2008 ­ to allow sufficient time to conduct jurisdictional discovery on the issues related to SRA' s alleged standing and to file their reply brief to SRA' s opposition. sf-2589901 Dated: October 14, 2008 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Thomas B. Walsh, IV Juanita R. Brooks ­ Lead Attorney (CA Bar No. 75934) E-mail: brooks@fr.com Fish & Richardson P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 678-5070 Facsimile: (858) 678-5099 Thomas B. Walsh, IV Texas Bar No. 00785173 Fish & Richardson P.C. 5000 Bank One Center 1717 Main Street Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 747-5070 Facsimile: (214) 747-2091 E-mail: walsh@fr.com Harry L. Gillam, Jr. Texas Bar No. 07921800 E-mail: gil@gillamsmithlaw.com Melissa R. Smith Texas Bar No. 24001351 E-mail: melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com GILLAM & SMITH, L.L.P. 303 South Washington Avenue Marshall, TX 75670 Telephone: (903) 934-8450 Facsimile: (903) 934-9257 Attorneys for Defendants GOOGLE INC. and AOL LLC sf-2589901 By: /s/ Richard S. J. Hung (by permission) Michael A. Jacobs (CA Bar No. 111664) Richard S. J. Hung (CA Bar No. 197425) MORRISON & FOERSTER 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415-268-7000 Facsimile: 415-268-7522 Email: mjacobs@mofo.com Email: rhung@mofo.com Otis Carroll Tex. Bar No. 03895700 IRELAND, CARROLL & KELLEY, P.C. 6101 S. Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75703 Tel: (903) 561-1600 Fax: (903) 581-1071 Email: Fedserv@icklaw.com Attorneys for Defendant YAHOO! INC. sf-2589901 By: /s/ Jennifer A. Kash (by permission) Claude M. Stern (CA Bar No. 96737) Jennifer A. Kash (CA Bar No. 203679) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 5 OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 55 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 Email: claudestern@quinnemanuel.com Email:jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com Otis Carroll Tex. Bar No. 03895700 Collin Maloney Tex. Bar No. 00794219 IRELAND, CARROLL & KELLEY, P.C. 6101 S. Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75703 Tel: (903) 561-1600 Fax: (903) 581-1071 Email: Fedserv@icklaw.com Attorneys for Defendants IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC. and LYCOS, INC. CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE The undersigned hereby certifies that a conference was previously held with Lee Kaplan, counsel for SRA, regarding the relief requested herein by Defendants ­ that Defendants be allowed until and including November 10, 2008 to file their reply brief related to the motion to dismiss previously filed by Defendants. Counsel for SRA stated that SRA does not oppose this request. /s/ Richard S.J. Hung (by permission) Richard S.J. Hung sf-2589901 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been served on October 14, 2008 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court' s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). /s/ Thomas B. Walsh, IV Thomas B. Walsh, IV sf-2589901

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?