Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson and Company

Filing 379

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 343 Report and Recommendations, denying 171 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Becton Dickinson and Company. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 3/26/13. (bas, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
RETRACTABLE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Plaintiffs,
v.
BECTON, DICKINSON AND CO.,
Defendant.

Case No. 2:08-CV-16

ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant Becton, Dickinson and Company’s Rule 12(c) Motion for
Judgment on the Pleadings Against Plaintiff Thomas J. Shaw (Doc. No. 171). On February 25,
2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation, which recommends denying BD’s
.
motion (Doc. No. 343). No objections have been filed.
The Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. BD’s
Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Against Plaintiff Thomas J. Shaw (Doc. No.
171) is DENIED for the reasons stated therein.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 26th day of March, 2013.

____________________________________
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE