Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson and Company
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying 173 Sealed Motion filed by Becton Dickinson and Company. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 8/19/13. (ehs, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
BECTON, DICKINSON AND CO.,
Case No. 2:08-CV-16-LED-RSP
Before the Court is Becton, Dickinson and Company’s Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment on the Antitrust (Counts 1 And 2) and Unfair Competition (Count 6) Claims (Dkt. No.
173, filed January 11, 2012). On March 14, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and
Recommendation, which recommends denying BD’s motion. (Dkt. No. 367.) BD filed its
Objections on March 25, 2013 (Dkt. No. 371), to which Plaintiff responded on April 11, 2013
(Dkt. 392) and BD replied on April 22, 2013 (Dkt. 403).
The Court has reviewed the objections raised by BD and finds them to be without merit,
as they raise no issues not already addressed in the R&R. Accordingly,
The Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. BD’s
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Antitrust (Counts 1 And 2) and Unfair
Competition (Count 6) Claims (Dkt. No. 173) is DENIED for the reasons stated therein.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 19th day of August, 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?