Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 29

ANSWER to 23 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC.(Chambers, J)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ____________________________________ PAID SEARCH ENGINE TOOLS, LLC Plaintiff, vs. GOOGLE, INC. and MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. ____________________________________ MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.2:08-cv-061 ) ) ) Counterclaim-Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) PAID SEARCH ENGINE TOOLS, LLC, ) ) Counterclaim-Defendant. ) ____________________________________) PLAINTIFF, PAID SEARCH ENGINE TOOLS, LLC'S, REPLY TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.'S COUNTERCLAIMS Plaintiff Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC or ("PSET"), by and through its counsel, herein replies to the numbered paragraphs of Defendant Google, Inc.'s ("Google") Counterclaims: PARTIES 1. 2. PSET admits the allegations of Paragraph 1 of the Counterclaims. PSET admits the allegations of Paragraphs 2 of the Counterclaims. 1 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. 4. 5. 6. PSET admits the allegations of Paragraph 3 of the Counterclaims. PSET admits the allegations of Paragraph 4 of the Counterclaims. PSET admits the allegations of Paragraph 5 of the Counterclaims. PSET admits that the '450 patent was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 6, 2006. PSET otherwise denies the allegations of Paragraph 6. 7. 8. PSET admits the allegations of Paragraph 7 of the Counterclaims. PSET admits the allegations of Paragraph 8 of the Counterclaims. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 9. Because Paragraph 9 of the Counterclaims incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 23 of Google's answer and defenses, PSET responds herein to Paragraphs 1 through 23 as follows: PSET denies all allegations in Paragraphs 1 through 19, 21 and 23, including any allegations incorporated by reference therein, that are not expressly admitted herein. With respect to Paragraph 20, PSET's responds that it had no obligation to mark under 35 U.S.C. §287(a). With respect to Paragraph 22, PSET admits only that on July 5, 2000, a provisional patent application was filed to which the '450 patent claims priority listing Jon Keel as an inventor, that on December 20, 2002, the application leading to the '450 patent was filed listing the named inventors of the '450 patent; and that the Summary of Invention of the '450 patent application and claims were identical to the Summary of Invention and claims of the provisional patent application. PSET otherwise denies the allegations of Paragraphs 22 of Google's answer and defenses. PSET incorporates its answers to paragraphs 1 through 8 of Google's counterclaims as if fully set forth herein. 2 10. 11. PSET denies the allegations of Paragraph 10 of the Counterclaims. Because Paragraph 11 of the Counterclaims incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 23 of Google's answer and defenses, PSET incorporates its responses set forth in Paragraph 9 as if fully set forth herein. 12. 13. PSET denies the allegations of Paragraph 12 of the Counterclaims. Because Paragraph 13 of the Counterclaims incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 23 of Google's answer and defenses, PSET incorporates its responses set forth in Paragraph 9 as if fully set forth herein. 14. 15. PSET denies the allegations of Paragraph 14 of the Counterclaims. PSET denies the allegations of Paragraph 15 of the Counterclaims. WHEREFORE, PSET prays for and demands the following relief: A. That Google's Counterclaims be dismissed with prejudice and that judgment be entered for PSET; B. C. That Google take nothing by its Counterclaims; That PSET be awarded its costs and attorney's fees in defending against Google's Counterclaims; and, D. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, Dated: July 24, 2008 s/ J. Robert Chambers S. Calvin Capshaw State Bar No. 0378390 ccapshaw@capshawlaw.com Elizabeth L. DeRieux State Bar No. 24053063 ederieux@capshawlaw.com CAPSHAW DeRIEUX, LLP 3 1127 Judson Road, Suite 200 P.O. Box 3999 75606-3999 Longview, TX 75601-5157 (903) 236-9800 (Telephone) (903) 236-8787 (Facsimile) J. Robert Chambers bchambers@whepatent.com P. Andrew Blatt dblatt@whepatent.com John Paul Davis jdavis@whepatent.com Brett A. Schatz bschatz@whepatent.com WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, L.L.P. 2700 Carew Tower 441 Vine Street Cincinnati, OH 45202-2917 (513) 241-2324 (Telephone) (513) 241-5960 (Facsimile) Attorneys for Plaintiff Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC OF COUNSEL: Gregory M. Utter gmutter@kmklaw.com W. Jeffrey Sefton jsefton@kmklaw.com KEATING MUETHING & KLEKAMP PLL One East Fourth St. Suite 1400 Cincinnati, OH 45202 (513) 579-6540 (Telephone) (513) 579-6457 (Facsimile) 782669_1.DOC 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing PLAINTIFF, PAID SEARCH ENGINE TOOLS, LLC'S, REPLY TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.'S COUNTERCLAIMS was served via the court's electronic filing system to all counsel of record this 24th day of July, 2008. J. Robert Chambers 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?