Harris v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Filing 7

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Blockbuster, Inc. identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Raiff, Michael) Modified on 6/18/2008 (mpv, ).

Download PDF
Harris v. Blockbuster, Inc. Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION CATHRYN ELAINE HARRIS, MARIO HERRERA, and MARYAM HOSSEINY on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BLOCKBUSTER INC. Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-cv-00155 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and to enable Judges and Magistrate Judges of the Court to evaluate possible disqualification or recusal, the undersigned counsel for Blockbuster Inc., a non-governmental corporate party, certifies that Blockbuster Inc. is a Delaware corporation headquartered in Dallas, Texas. Blockbuster Inc. does not have a parent corporation, and no publicly-held corporation owns 10% or more of its own stock. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michael L. Raiff __________________________ Michael L. Raiff State Bar No. 00784803 Frank C. Brame State Bar No. 24031874 Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3700 Dallas, Texas 75201 214.220.7705 214.999.7705 (fax) mraiff@velaw.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT BLOCKBUSTER INC. 1 Dockets.Justia.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement was served by ECF on the 17th day of June, 2008 on counsel of record for Plaintiffs. /s/ Michael L. Raiff __________________________ Michael L. Raiff Dallas 1415439v.1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?