Stragent, LLC v. Nokia Inc. et al

Filing 3

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thomas John Ward, Jr on behalf of Stragent, LLC (Ward, Thomas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION STRAGENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. NOKIA, INC., NOKIA CORPORATION, MOTOROLA, INC., PALM, INC., RESEARCH IN MOTION, LTD., RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION, SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB, SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC., AMERICA ONLINE, INC., AOL LLC, AT&T, INC., GOOGLE, INC., MICROSOFT CORPORATION AND YAHOO!, INC. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-293 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF T. JOHN WARD, JR. COMES NOW Plaintiff, Stragent, LLC, and hereby notifies the Court and all parties of record that, in addition to the attorneys already representing it, T. John Ward, Jr., State Bar Number 00794818, of the Ward & Smith Law Firm, P.O. Box 1231, Longview, Texas, 75606-1231, (903) 757-6400, will be appearing as an attorney of record on its behalf in the above-styled and numbered cause. Respectfully submitted, ___________________________________ T. John Ward, Jr. State Bar No. 00794818 Ward & Smith Law Firm P.O. Box 1231 Longview, Texas 75606-1231 (903) 757-6400 (telephone) (903) 757-2323 (facsimile) E-mail: jw@jwfirm.com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). Therefore, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by email on this the 29th day of July, 2008. ______________________________ T. John Ward, Jr.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?