Gray v. Manning
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - the Court adopts the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, in its entirety, as the conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs above-entitled and numbered cause of action is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 12/3/2010. (ch, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REGINA GRAY Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL MANNING Defendant. § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-CV-007-TJW-CE § § § § ORDER The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 29), which recommends that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), has been presented for consideration. The plaintiff did not file an objection to the report and recommendation. The Court is of the opinion that the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court adopts the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, in its entirety, as the conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff's above-entitled and numbered cause of action is DISMISSED. SIGNED this 3rd day of December, 2010.
__________________________________________ T. JOHN WARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?