API Technologies, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. et al
Filing
33
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation.( Richardson, Michael)
API Technologies, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. et al
Doc. 33
uAsr
(02-2008)
Artach this fomr to the Application for Extensíon of Tíme to Answer Complaint evanl'
CA9E AND Dteouue lxroRMATtoN
Civil Action No.: 2 : 09 - cv-L47
Name ofparlyrequesting extension:
Dun & Bradstreet Corp'
Is this the first application for extension of time in this case?
ø
Yes
T No
If no, please indicate which application this represents:
n n
Second
Third
Date of Service of Summons: Number of days requested:
May
L9,
tr Other
2009
I n
/ 09
roaays
n Other_
(ll"etluired)
ts øyt
days
Neu' De¿idline Date: 07 /
AB
ATT9RNEY F,LING APPLIçATtoN INFoRMATIoN
FullName:
FirmName:
Míchael R. Richardson
24002838
LLP
State BarNo.:
Beck, Redden & Secrest, Address: l-221 McKinney, SuiEe 4500 HousEon, Texas 770I0
Phone:
713-95L-3700 þ¿1; ?L3 -95L-3720 Email; mríchardson@brsf irm.
com
A cerliflcate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application'
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?