Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Careerbuilder, LLC et al

Filing 58


Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BENEFICIAL INNOVATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CAREERBUILDER, LLC, a Delaware corporation; CNET NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware corporation; THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS, INC., a Delaware corporation; DIGG, INC., a Delaware corporation; EBAUM's WORLD, INC., a New York corporation; GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation; JABEZ NETWORKS, INC., a Tennessee corporation; MORRIS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company; THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, a New York corporation; YAHOO! INC., a Delaware corporation; YOUTUBE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; COMCAST CORPORATION; DISNEY ONLINE; FACEBOOK, INC.; IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC.; NBC UNIVERSAL, INC.; THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, Defendants. Case No.: 2:09-CV-175-TJW Jury Trial Demanded DEFENDANT YOUTUBE, LLC'S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendant YouTube, LLC ("YouTube") hereby states: 1. YouTube is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Google. Dated: November 4, 2009 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Melissa R. Smith Melissa Richards Smith Email: Gillam & Smith, LLP 303 South Washington Avenue Marshall, TX 75670 Telephone: (903) 934-8450 Facsimile: (903) 934-9257 Attorneys for Defendant YouTube, LLC -2- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by certified mail, return receipt requested, on this the 4th day of November, 2009. /s/ Melissa R. Smith Melissa R. Smith -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?