Marvell Semiconductor Inc. et al v. WI-Lan, Inc.,

Filing 21

ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING HEARING DATE FORDEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER. Set/Reset Deadlines as to (31 in 5:08-cv-04555-JW) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Motion Hearing set for 5/1/2009 01:30 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/25/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2009) [Transferred from California Northern on 10/16/2009.]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Intel Corp., ___________________________________/ Broadcom Corp., ___________________________________/ Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. ___________________________________/ Acer America Corp., ___________________________________/ Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., et al., v. Wi-Lan, Inc., Defendant. / Plaintiffs, NO. C 08-04555 JW NO. C 08-05543 JW NO. C 08-05544 JW NO. C 08-05624 JW NO. C 08-05742 JW ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER

United United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On March 16, 2009, the Court conducted a Case Management Conference. Counsel for the respective parties were present. In light of the discussion at the Conference, the Court orders as follows: (1) The Court adopts the briefing schedule set out in the parties' Joint Case Management Statement for Defendant's pending Motion to Dismiss, with the following modification: The Court will conduct a hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or Transfer on May 1, 2009 at 1:30 p.m.1

1

this date.

Due to the Court's unavailability, the Court continues the hearing from April 24, 2009 to

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

(2)

Ten (10) days after the Court rules on Defendant's Motion in the Intel action, the parties shall inform the Court of their proposals for moving forward with litigation in all five related actions. The Court will set a date for a further Case Management Conference in its order addressing Defendant's Motion.

Dated: March 25, 2009

JAMES WARE United States District Judge

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: A. James Isbester [e-mail] Adam R. Alper [e-mail] Christian Chadd Taylor [e-mail] Gayle Esther Rosenstein [e-mail] George C. Best [e-mail] Gregory S. Arovas [e-mail] John M. Desmarais [e-mail] Megan M Chung [e-mail] Michael C. Spillner [e-mail] Michael Woodrow De Vries [e-mail] Robert A. Cote [e-mail]

Dated: March 25, 2009

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28