Adrain v. Vigilant Video, Inc. et al

Filing 52

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The court adopts the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, in its entirety, as the conclusions of this court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants motion to dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 3/25/2011.(ch, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION JOHN B. ADRAIN vs. VIGILANT VIDEO, INC., ET AL. § § § § § ORDER The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 42), which contains his recommendation that the court deny defendant City of Port Arthur's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 11), has been presented for consideration. Neither party filed an objection to the report and recommendation. The court is of the opinion that the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the court adopts the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, in its entirety, as the conclusions of this court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED. SIGNED this 25th day of March, 2011.

CASE NO. 2:10-CV-173-TJW-CE

__________________________________________ T. JOHN WARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE