Microunity Systems Engineering, Inc v. Acer Inc. et al

Filing 111

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Motorola Inc., (Abraham, Amanda)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MICROUNITY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INC. Plaintiff, v. ACER INC., et al. Defendants. § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO: 2:10-cv-185 § § § § the following financial information to enable judges and magistrate judges to evaluate the above-captioned action, certifies that: 1. Motorola, Inc. is a publicly traded company under the ticker symbol MOT. more than 10% of Motorola, Inc. stock. common stock as of March 31, 2010. 3, 2010. possible disqualification or recusal. Undersigned counsel for Motorola, Inc., defendant in 2. There is no parent corporation or other publicly traded corporation owning Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil procedure, Motorola, Inc. provides CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF MOTOROLA, INC. 3. Dodge & Cox, a privately held investment advisor, held 9.93% of Motorola, Inc.'s 4. Icahn Associates Corp. held 9.99% of Motorola, Inc's common stock as of August Respectfully submitted, _______________________________________ Carl R. Roth cr@rothfirm.com Brendan C. Roth br@rothfirm.com Amanda A. Abraham aa@rothfirm.com THE ROTH LAW FIRM, P.C. 115 N. Wellington, Suite 200 Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: (903) 935-1665 Facsimile: (903) 935-1797 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT MOTOROLA, INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the counsel of record will be served by facsimile transmission and/or first class mail. Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) this 11TH day of August, 2010. Any other ______________________________________________ Amanda A. Abraham The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?