Microunity Systems Engineering, Inc v. Acer Inc. et al

Filing 133

RESPONSE to 91 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim Plaintiff's Answer to Defendant Motorola Inc.'s Counterclaims by Microunity Systems Engineering, Inc. (Grinstein, Joseph)

Download PDF
Microunity Systems Engineering, Inc v. Acer Inc. et al Doc. 133 TN THE LINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSFIALL DIVISION $ $ MICROUNITY SYSTEMS ENGINEERTNG, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff. V. $ $ $ $ $ Civil Action No. 2:10-cv-000185 TJW-CE ACER INC., et al. Defendants. $ ENDANT M Plaintiff MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc. ("MicroUnity") files its answer to the Counterclaims stated by defendant Motorola, Inc. ("Motorola") inits Answer and Counterclaims to Ptaintiff MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.'s Complaint ■r Patent Infringement, filred on August 11, 2010. MicroUnity denies the allegations in Motorola's Counterclaims unless expressly admitted in the following paragraphs. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The allegations of paragtaph 50 are not factual and do not require a response. To the extent that these allegations require a response, they are denied' MicroUnity denies the allegations of paragraph 51. MicroUnity denies the allegations of paragtaph52. MicroUnity admits the allegations of paragraph 53. MicroUnity denies the allegations of paragraph54. MicroUnity denies the allegations of paragraph 55. In response to Motorola's Prayer for Relief, MicroUnity denies that Motorola is entitled to relief of any kind. REOUEST FOR RELIEF Therefore, MicroUnity requests the following relief: l2351l1vr/011876 Dockets.Justia.com a. b. c. that the Court enter a judgment in favor of MicroUnity on all claims asserted against it by Motorola that the Court award MicroUnity its attorneys' fees and costs of court, together pre- judgment and post-judgment interest in the maximum amount provided by law; and that the Court award MicroUnity all other relief to which it may be entitled. DATED: September 1,2010 Respectfully Submitted, isl Joseph S. Grinstein Stephen D. Susman, Attomey-in-Charge State BarNo. 1952100 ssusman@susmangodfrey. com Max L. Tribble, Jr. State BarNo.20213950 mtribble@susmangodfrey. com Joseph S. Grinstein State Bar No. 24002188 j grinstein@susman godfr ey. com SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (7 13) 651-9366 Facsimile: (713) 654-6666 Sidney Calvin Capshaw state Bar No. 03783900 ccapshaw@capshawlaw. com CAPSIIAW DEzuETIX, L.L.P. 1127 Judson Rd - Ste220 PO Box 3999 Longview, TX 7 5601-5157 (e03) 236-9800 Fax: (903) 236-8787 Otis W. Carroll State BarNo.00794219 nancy@icklaw.com IRELAND, CARROLL &,\<ELLEY, P.C. 6101 South Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, TX75703 Telephone: (903) 561-1 600 Facsimile: (903) 58 1-1071 12351 l0vl/01 1876 Michael F. Heim State Bar No. 09380923 mheim@hpcllp.com HEIM, PAYNE & CHORUSH, L.L.P. 600 Travis, Suite 6710 Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone : (7 13) 221 -2000 Facsimile: (7 13) 221 -2021 Douglas R. Wilson BarNo.24037719 dwilson@hpcllp.com HEIM, PAYNE & CHORUSH, L.L.P. 9442 Capital of Texas Hwy. Plazal, Suite 500-146 Austin, Texas 78759 State Telephone : (5 12) 3 43 -3 622 Facsimile: (512) 3 45 -2924 George M. Schwab State BarNo. 58250 (CA) ss chwab fA. sms■atent. com LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE M. SCHV/AB 235 Montgomery St., Suite 1026 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (41 5) 889-52 1 0 Attorneys for MICROLINITY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE document Court, Eastern District of Texas, using the electronic with the clerk of the court for the U.S. District filing system of the court. The electronic case filing system sent a "Notice of Electronic Filing" to the ßttorneys of record who have consented in writing to accept this Notice as service of this document by electronic means. /s/ Joseph S. Grinstein Joseph S. Grinstein I hereby certify that on September 1,2010,I electronically filed the foregoing 1235 1 l0v l/01 1876

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?