Ford-Lee v. Astrue
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 21 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that the Commissioners Motion to Remand (docket entry #20) is hereby GRANTED and this action is hereby REVERSED AND REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the findings herein. It is further ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/12/11. (ehs, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
DELORES FORD-LEE
§
v.
§
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv298
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his findings,
conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this action, has been presented for
consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the Commissioner’s Motion to
Remand (docket entry #20) be granted and the case be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence
four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the findings
therein. No written objections have been filed. The findings and conclusions of the Magistrate
Judge are therefore adopted as those of the Court.
In light of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Motion to Remand (docket entry #20) is hereby
GRANTED and this action is hereby REVERSED AND REMANDED pursuant to sentence four
of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the findings herein. It
is further
ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED.
SIGNED this 12th day of September, 2011.
__________________________________________
T. JOHN WARD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?