Pittsburg SNF LLC et al v. PharMerica East, Inc.

Filing 218

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - (Dkt.No. 63) is DENIED, except that PharMericas counterclaim for abuse of process is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/28/2012. (ch, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PITTSBURG SNF LLC, et al., v. PHARMERICA EAST, INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. PHARMASTER, L.P., et al., Third-Party Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § Case No. 2:10-CV-363-JRG-RSP ORDER Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on July 19, 2012 (Dkt. No. 165) recommending that the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss PharMerica’s Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 63, filed November 14, 2011) be DENIED-IN-PART and GRANTED-IN-PART: PharMerica’s counterclaims should not be dismissed or struck, except . that PharMerica’s counterclaim for abuse of process should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. No objections having been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is adopted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss PharMerica’s Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 63) is DENIED, except that PharMerica’s counterclaim for abuse of process is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28th day of September, 2012. ____________________________________ RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?