Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Inc. et al

Filing 113

ORDER granting 111 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 94 MOTION to Consolidate Cases, 104 Cross MOTION to Sever Pursuant to Rules 20 and 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 111 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 109 Response in Opposition to Motion, 108 Reply to Response to MotionUnopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Replly. Replies due by 10/28/2011.. Signed by Judge David Folsom on October 28, 2011. (jml, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION WIRELESS RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, vs. A9.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., GOOGLE INC., NOKIA, INC., and RICOH INNOVATIONS, INC., Defendants. WIRELESS RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, vs. NOKIA CORPORATION and RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Defendants. WIRELESS RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, vs. A9.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., GOOGLE INC., NOKIA, INC., and RICOH INNOVATIONS, INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil No. 2:10-CV-00364-DF § § § § § § Civil No. 2:10-CV-00365-DF § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil No. 2:10-CV-00577-DF WIRELESS RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, vs. NOKIA CORPORATION and RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Defendants. § § § § § § Civil No. 2:10-CV-00578-DF § § § § § ORDER Before the Court is Defendants A9.com, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Google Inc., Nokia, Inc., Ricoh Innovations, Inc., Nokia Corporation, and Ricoh Company, Ltd.’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file their Sur-Reply to Plaintiff Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC’s Motion to Consolidate Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) and Local Rule CV-42(b), as well as their Reply in support of Defendants’ Cross-Motion to Sever Pursuant to Rules 20 and 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Finding the motion well taken, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion. Defendants shall . have up to and including Friday, October 28, 2011, to file their Sur-Reply to Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate and their Reply to Defendants’ Cross-Motion to Sever. SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 28th day of October, 2011. ____________________________________ DAVID FOLSOM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?