Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Inc. et al

Filing 35

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Amazon.com, Inc. (Shvodian, Daniel)

Download PDF
Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Inc. et al Doc. 35 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION WIRELESS RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Civil No. 2:10-CV-00364-TJW-CE Plaintiff, vs. A9.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., GOOGLE, INC., NOKIA, INC., and RICOH INNOVATIONS, INC., Defendants. JURY DEFENDANT AMAZON.COM, INC.'S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1 Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. ("Amazon"), through the undersigned, hereby discloses that Amazon does not have a parent corporation and is unaware of any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of Amazon's stock. Dated: November 17, 2010 By: /s/ Daniel T. Shvodian James F. Valentine (admitted pro hac vice) California State Bar No. 149269 Daniel T. Shvodian (admitted pro hac vice) California State Bar No. 184576 Aaron R. Hand California State Bar No. 245755 (Registered in E.D. Tex.) HOWREY LLP 1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: 650.798.3500 Facsimile: 650.798.3600 E-mail: ValentineJ@howrey.com 1 Dockets.Justia.com E-mail: ShvodianD@howrey.com E-mail: HandA@howrey.com Michael C. Smith Texas State Bar No. 18650410 SIEBMAN, BURG, PHILLIPS & SMITH, LLP 111 East Austin Street Marshall, TX 75671-1556 Telephone: 903.938.8900 Facsimile: 972.767.4620 E-mail: michaelsmith@siebman.com Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant AMAZON.COM, INC. 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record, who are deemed to have consented to electronic service, are being served this 17th day of November, 2010, with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system. /s/ Daniel T. Shvodian Daniel T. Shvodian 1 DM_US:23535014_1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?