Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Inc. et al

Filing 66

ORDER granting 65 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 62 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)Opposed MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)Opposed MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) Responses due by 4/25/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 4/11/2011. (ch, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION WIRELESS RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. A9.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., GOOGLE, INC., NOKIA, INC. and RICOH INNOVATIONS, INC. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § C.A. No. 2:10-cv-00364-TJW-CE JURY ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC’s (“WRT”) Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Defendants A9.com, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Google, Inc., Nokia, Inc. and Ricoh Innovations, Inc.’s (“collectively defendants”) Motion to Transfer to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Finding the motion well taken, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion. WRT shall have up to and including Monday, April 25, 2011, to file its response. SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 11th day of April, 2011. ___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?