Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Inc. et al

Filing 95

Additional Attachments to Main Document (CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE SHOWING OPPOSED) : 94 MOTION to Consolidate Cases.. (Davis, William)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
WIRELESS RECOGNITION
TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
A9.COM, INC.,
AMAZON.COM, INC.,
GOOGLE, INC.,
NOKIA, INC.
and
RICOH INNOVATIONS, INC.
Defendants.
WIRELESS RECOGNITION
TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
NOKIA CORPORATION, and
RICOH COMPANY, LTD
Defendants.
WIRELESS RECOGNITION
TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
A9.COM, INC.,
AMAZON.COM, INC.,
GOOGLE, INC.,
NOKIA, INC.
and
RICOH INNOVATIONS, INC.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

C.A. No. 2:10-cv-00364-TJW-CE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

C.A. No. 2:10-cv-00365-TJW

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

C.A. No. 2:10-cv-00577-TJW-CE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

1

Defendants.

)

WIRELESS RECOGNITION
TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
NOKIA CORPORATION, and
RICOH COMPANY, LTD
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

C.A. No. 2:10-cv-00578-TJW-CE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I hereby certify that on July 14, 2011, the undersigned conferred with Dan Shvodian,
counsel for A9.com, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., and Google, Inc.; Allison Altersohn, counsel for
Nokia, Inc.; Mark Rowland, counsel for Ricoh Innovations, Inc. and Ricoh Company, Ltd.; and
Michael Smith, counsel for all defendants except Ricoh Innovations, Inc. and Ricoh Company,
Ltd. Defense counsels’ position was that because trial was over two years away, there was no
need to address consolidation for all purposes. Plaintiffs disagree and believe that court and
party resources are conserved by consolidation for all purposes. Discussions conclusively ended
in an impasse leaving an open issue for the court to decide.

/s/ Cameron H. Tousi
Cameron H. Tousi
/s/ William E. Davis, III
William E. Davis, III

2