Luv N' Care, LTD. et al v. Royal King Infant Products Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 55

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - filed by the Magistrate Judge on June 28, 2012 (Dkt. No. 49). Defendants Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. Nos. 14 and 26) are GRANTED to the extent of dismissing without prejudice all claims against Defendant Dalbir Khurana other than the claims of fraudulent inducement, and otherwise DENIED, and (2) that the Motions to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. Nos. 15 and 27) be DENIED. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/6/12. (ehs, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
LUV N’ CARE, LTD, et al.

§
§
§
§
§

v.
ROYAL KING INFANT
PRODUCTS CO., LTD., et al.

Case No. 2:10-CV-0461-JRG-RSP

ORDER
Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate
Judge on June 28, 2012 (Dkt. No. 49) recommending (1) that the Defendants’ Motions to
Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. Nos. 14 and 26) be granted to the extent of
dismissing without prejudice all claims against Defendant Dalbir Khurana other than the claims
of fraudulent inducement, and otherwise denied, and (2) that the Motions to Dismiss Under Rule
12(b)(6) (Dkt. Nos. 15 and 27) be denied.

Having considered the Objections filed by

Defendants (Dkt. No. 53), and finding them to be without sufficient merit, the Recommendation
.
is adopted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Personal
Jurisdiction (Dkt. Nos. 14 and 26) are GRANTED to the extent of dismissing without prejudice
all claims against Defendant Dalbir Khurana other than the claims of fraudulent inducement, and
otherwise DENIED, and (2) that the Motions to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. Nos. 15 and
27) be DENIED.

SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of August, 2012.

____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE