Alexander v. Texas Frac Fluids LLC

Filing 37

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - the court adopts the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, in its entirety, as the conclusions of this court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants motion to dismiss is GRANTED. It is, however, noted that Plaintiff has already filed an amended complaint. Therefore, although the court has granted the motion to dismiss, with leave to amend, the case shall remain open and any future motions shall be directed toward the amended complaint. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 8/30/2011. (ch, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION HENRY ALEXANDER § § § § § vs. TEXAS FRAC FLUIDS LLC CASE NO. 2:10-CV-488-TJW-CE ORDER The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 27) has been presented for consideration. The report recommends that the court grant Defendant’s motion to dismiss. The report also recommends, however, that the court grant Plaintiff leave to amend his pleading within fourteen (14) days from the date he receives an order adopting the report. No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s report were filed. The court is of the opinion that the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the court adopts the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, in its entirety, as the conclusions of this court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. It is, however, noted that Plaintiff has already filed an amended complaint. Therefore, although the court has granted the motion to dismiss, with leave to amend, the case shall remain open and any future motions shall be directed toward the amended complaint. SIGNED this 30th day of August, 2011. __________________________________________ T. JOHN WARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?