Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. v. Interwoven, Inc. et al

Filing 5

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by William Ellsworth Davis, III on behalf of Vertical Computer Systems Inc (Davis, William)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. INTERWOVEN, INC., LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC., LG ELECTRONICS INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants. § § § § Civil Action No. 2:10-cv-490 § § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED § § § § § § § § NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Vertical Computer Systems, Inc., Plaintiff in the above-entitled and numbered civil action, hereby notifies the Court and all parties that the following person, in addition to those who previously gave notice, is appearing as attorney of record: William E. Davis, III Texas State Bar No. 24047416 The Davis Firm, PC 111 West Tyler St. Longview, Texas 75601 Telephone: 903-230-9090 Facsimile: 903-230-9661 Dated: November 19, 2010 Respectfully Submitted, VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. By: /s/ William E. Davis, III William E. Davis III Texas State Bar No. 24047416 The Davis Firm, PC 111 West Tyler Street Longview, Texas 75601 Phone: 903-230-9090 Facsimile: 903-230-9661 bdavis@bdavisfirm.com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by email, on this the 19th day of November, 2010. /s/ William E. Davis, III William E. Davis, III

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?