Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. v. Interwoven, Inc. et al
Filing
87
RESPONSE in Opposition re 84 SEALED MOTION to Sever and Transfer Claims filed by Vertical Computer Systems Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Luiz Claudio Valdetaro (signed), # 2 Exhibit A - Google Information on LG Electronics, # 3 Exhibit B - Complaint (Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. v. Interwoven, Inc., et al; Civil Action No. 210-cv-490), # 4 Exhibit C - Samsung's Claim Charts, # 5 Exhibit D - LG's Claim Charts, # 6 Exhibit E - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - Brief of Petitioner - Vertical Computer Systems, Inc, # 7 Exhibit F - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - Petition on Writ of Mandamus Order, # 8 Exhibit G - U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California - Claims Construction Order, # 9 Exhibit H - Declaration of Seo Won Kwon, # 10 Exhibit I - LexisNexis Documents, # 11 Exhibit J - LexisNexis Documents, # 12 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, William)
EXHIBIT B
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1
Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
INTERWOVEN, INC.,
LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM
U.S.A., INC., LG ELECTRONICS
INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 2:10-cv-490
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. ("Vertical") brings this action against
Defendant Interwoven, Inc. ("Interwoven"), LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., INC., LG
Electronics Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
(collectively, "defendants"), alleging as follows:
PARTIES
1.
Plaintiff Vertical is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business in
Richardson, Texas.
2.
Defendant Interwoven is a Delaware corporation and has its principal place of
business at 160 East Tasman Drive, San Jose, California. Interwoven is doing business in this
judicial district and may be served with process through its Registered Agent, Dona Niemeyer
located at 2730 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 100, Sacramento, California 95833-3503.
3.
Defendant LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. is a California corporation
and has its principal place of business at 1000 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632. LG
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1
Filed 11/15/10 Page 2 of 7
Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. is doing business in this judicial district and may be
served with process through its Registered Agent, Alan K. Tse, 10101 Old Grove Road, San
Diego, CA 92131.
4.
LG Electronics Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of
Korea and has its principal place of business at LG Twin Towers 20, Yeouido dong,
Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea 150-721.
5.
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. is a New York corporation and has its
principal place of business at 85 Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660. Samsung is
doing business in this judicial district and may be served with process through its Registered
Agent, CT Corporation System, 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10011.
6.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is a corporation organized under the laws of the
Republic of Korea and has its principal place of business at 1320-10, Seocho 2-dong, Seocho-gu,
Seoul 137-857, Republic of Korea.
JURSIDICTION AND VENUE
7.
Vertical's patent infringement action arises under the patent laws of the United
States, including 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281. This Court has exclusive subject matter jurisdiction
over this civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).
8.
Interwoven has minimum contacts with the Marshall Division of the Eastern
District of Texas such that this venue is a fair and reasonable one. Interwoven has committed
such purposeful acts and/or transactions in Texas that it reasonably knew and expected would
result in it being brought into a Texas court as a consequence of its business activities. For these
reasons, venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c) and 28 U.S.C. §
1400(b).
2
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1
9.
Filed 11/15/10 Page 3 of 7
LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. and LG Electronics Inc. (collectively,
"LG") have minimum contacts with the Marshall Division of the Eastern District of Texas such
that this venue is a fair and reasonable one. LG has committed such purposeful acts and/or
transactions in Texas that it reasonably knew and expected would result in it being brought into a
Texas court as a consequence of its business activities. For these reasons, venue is proper in this
Court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c) and 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b).
10.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
(collectively, "Samsung") have minimum contacts with the Marshall Division of the Eastern
District of Texas such that this venue is a fair and reasonable one. Samsung has committed such
purposeful acts and/or transactions in Texas that it reasonably knew and expected would result in
it being brought into a Texas court as a consequence of its business activities. For these reasons,
venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c) and 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b).
PATENT INFRINGEMENT
11.
On November 30, 2004, United States Patent No. 6,826,744 (the “‘744 patent”)
was duly and legally issued for a “System and Method for Generating Web Sites in an Arbitrary
Object Framework.”
12.
On May 11, 2010, United States Patent No. 7,716,629 (the “‘629 patent”) was
duly and legally issued for a “System and Method for Generating Web Sites in an Arbitrary
Object Framework.”
13.
Vertical is the owner of the ‘744 and '629 patents and has standing to sue for
infringement.
14.
Interwoven manufactures, has made, uses, sells and/or offers for sale software
such as the Interwoven TeamSite 2006 product that, when used, is covered by at least claims 1-
3
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1
Filed 11/15/10 Page 4 of 7
11, 18-19, 21, 23-33, 40-41 and 45-53 of the ‘744 patent and 1-6, 8-17, 19-26 and 28-32 of the
'629 patent. Interwoven has also induced others to infringe and/or has contributorily infringed
those claims of the ‘744 and '629 patents.
15.
Defendants LG and Samsung manufacture, have made, use, import, sell and/or
offer for sale cellular telephones covered by at least one claim of each of the '744 and '629
patents. Defendants LG and Samsung have also infringed and continue to infringe the '744 and
'629 patents by actively inducing others to infringe with specific intent and by contributing to the
infringement by others by the use, sale and/or offer for sale of the infringing cellular telephones.
The infringement that has occurred is at least one of the following claims through
commercialization of at least the following model phones:
LG
Samsung
Claims of
'744 Patent
1,3,4,5,9,17,21,
23,25
1,3,4,5,9,17,21,
23,25
Claims of
'629 Patent
1,4,8,10,12,21,24,
28,30,32
1,4,8,10,12,21,24,
28,30,32
Model Nos.
Ally™ VS740
Galaxy Tab™ Tablet Computer
Galaxy Captivate™ Android Phone
Galaxy Fascinate™ Android Phone
Galaxy Epic™ Android Phone
Samsung Galaxy Mesmerize™
i500 Touch Screen Cell Phone
STATUTORY NOTICE
16.
Vertical has placed the required statutory notice on all software products sold by
it under the '744 and '629 patents.
WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT
17.
Vertical has given written notice to Interwoven of the ‘744 patent by a letter dated
January 12, 2009 and since that time, Interwoven has been willfully infringing the '744 patent.
4
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1
18.
Filed 11/15/10 Page 5 of 7
In a meeting between Interwoven and Vertical personnel held on March 5, 2009
in San Jose, California, Interwoven intentionally concealed its infringement of the '744 patent.
19.
Vertical has given written notice to Interwoven of the '629 patent by a letter dated
August 12, 2010 and since that time, Interwoven has been willfully infringing the '629 patent.
20.
Interwoven again mislead Vertical into believing that it would attempt to resolve
any patent infringement claim by Vertical by negotiating in good faith, but it obtained an
extension of time under the pretext of studying the issues presented by Vertical to prepare a
lawsuit against Vertical.
RELIEF
21.
Vertical has been damaged as a result of Interwoven's, LG's and Samsung's
infringing conduct and LG, Samsung and Interwoven are, thus, liable to Vertical in an amount
that adequately compensates Vertical for LG's, Samsung's and Interwoven’s infringement,
which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty for each of these three defendants.
22.
LG, Samsung and Interwoven will continue their infringement of the ‘744 and
'629 patents unless enjoined by the Court. LG's, Samsung's and Interwoven’s infringing conduct
causes Vertical irreparable harm and will continue to cause such harm without the issuance of an
injunction.
JURY DEMAND
23.
Vertical hereby requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Vertical respectfully requests that the Court find in its favor and against LG, Samsung
and Interwoven and that the Court grant Vertical the following relief:
5
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1
a.
Filed 11/15/10 Page 6 of 7
Judgment that one or more claims of United States Patent No.
6,826,744 and United States Patent No. 7,716,629 have been
infringed, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents,
by LG, Samsung and Interwoven and/or by others to whose
infringement LG, Samsung and Interwoven have contributed
and/or by others whose infringement has been induced by LG,
Samsung and Interwoven;
b.
Judgment that Interwoven, LG and Samsung account for and pay
to Vertical all damages to and costs incurred by Vertical because
of Interwoven, LG and Samsung’s infringing activities and other
conduct complained of herein;
c.
That Vertical be granted pre-judgment and post-judgment interest
on the damages caused to it by reason of Interwoven’s infringing
activities and other conduct complained of herein;
d.
That this Court declare this an exceptional case and award Vertical
its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in accordance with 28
U.S.C. § 285;
e.
That Interwoven’s infringement be found willful and that the Court
award increased damages of three times the actual damages
awarded;
f.
That Interwoven, LG and Samsung be permanently enjoined from
any further activity or conduct that infringes any claims of United
6
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1
Filed 11/15/10 Page 7 of 7
States Patent No. 6,824,744 and United States Patent No.
7,716,629; and
g.
That Vertical be granted such other and further relief as the Court
or jury may deem just and proper under the circumstances.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: November 15, 2010
VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
/s/ Lu Pham
Lu Pham
State Bar No. 15895430
Lynn Pham & Ross, LLP
306 W. Broadway Avenue
Fort Worth, Texas 76104
Telephone: (817) 332-8505
Facsimile: (817) 332-8548
pham@laborcounsel.net
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
7
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-1
Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-1
Filed 11/15/10 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-1
Filed 11/15/10 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-1
Filed 11/15/10 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-1
Filed 11/15/10 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-1
Filed 11/15/10 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-1
Filed 11/15/10 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-1
Filed 11/15/10 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-1
Filed 11/15/10 Page 9 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-2
Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-2
Filed 11/15/10 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-2
Filed 11/15/10 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-2
Filed 11/15/10 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-2
Filed 11/15/10 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-2
Filed 11/15/10 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-2
Filed 11/15/10 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-2
Filed 11/15/10 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:10-cv-00490-TJW Document 1-2
Filed 11/15/10 Page 9 of 9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?