Rockstar Consortium US LP et al v. Google Inc
Filing
3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/31/2013. (ch, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL
ACTIONS ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ROY S. PAYNE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636 and the Local Rules of Court for the Assignment of Duties to
United States Magistrate Judges, it is ORDERED:
CASES REFERRED
1. Forty percent (40%) of selected civil actions filed in the Marshall Division of the Eastern
District of Texas after the effective date of this order and assigned to United States District Judge
Rodney Gilstrap (“Judge Gilstrap”) are referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne
(“Judge Payne”).
PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS
2. Judge Payne shall handle all pretrial proceedings in cases referred under paragraph 1.
This shall include:
a. hear and determine all matters within the magistrate judge’s dispositive jurisdiction;
b. proceed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) concerning matters
excepted from magistrate judge’s dispositive jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(A); and
c. after approval of the final pretrial order, the magistrate judge shall issue a report to the
district judge indicating that the case is ready for trial and that all the parties have not
consented to his jurisdiction.
Upon receipt of this report, the referral under paragraph 1 shall be withdrawn, and the case
shall be returned to Judge Gilstrap for all further proceedings and entry of judgment.
CONSENT
3. Upon receipt of signed consent forms by all parties, the case shall be reassigned to Judge
Payne, who shall conduct all proceedings, including jury and non-jury trials, and order the entry of
judgment.
REFERRAL PROCEDURE
4. Cases referred to Judge Payne under this order shall be selected randomly.
5. The clerk shall administer the random referrals and case assignments to Judge Payne
according to procedure devised by the clerk and approved in advance by the undersigned.
6. Every case referral shall be free from actual or potential influence or manipulation by any
litigant, counsel, member of the public, or unauthorized member of the court staff. The clerk shall
secure case assignment records and paraphernalia utilized in making random referrals and
assignments to ensure the unauthorized members of the court’s staff, attorneys, litigants, and
members of the public may not ascertain the name of the judicial officer(s) previously selected
from the random case referral and assignment arrays; the name of the next judicial officer in the
arrays; or the name(s) of any remaining judicial officer(s) in the arrays.
7. In the event of recusal or other disqualification of the magistrate judge in a case referred
and assigned under this order, the case shall return automatically to the docket of Judge Gilstrap,
subject to further orders of this court.
8. Case referrals pursuant to paragraph 1, case reassignments under paragraph 3, and
withdrawals of referrals under paragraphs 2 and 7 shall be effected automatically under this order.
Absent special circumstances, case-specific orders of reference, reassignment, and withdrawal
shall not be entered.
9. This order does not affect General Orders 05-4, 05-5, 05-6, 05-7, and 05-8 or other
established procedures for reference to magistrate judge of special category cases (e.g.,
.
preliminary motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel in Title VII
cases, prisoner cases, matters on the miscellaneous docket, etc.).
10. Nothing herein shall preclude reference of additional matters to the magistrate judge or
the withdrawal of references in cases subject to this order whenever appropriate.
This order is effective immediately, in accordance with the undersigned’s directive to the
clerk.
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3rd day of February, 2012.
____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?