Rockstar Consortium US LP et al v. Google Inc
Filing
93
Additional Attachments to Main Document: 92 MOTION for Leave to File A Supplemental Brief In Response To Googles Motion To Transfer In Light Of Newly-Acquired Evidence.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 31, # 2 Exhibit 32, # 3 Exhibit 33, # 4 Exhibit 34, # 5 Exhibit 35, # 6 Exhibit 36, # 7 Exhibit 37, # 8 Exhibit 38, # 9 Exhibit 39, # 10 Exhibit 40, # 11 Exhibit 41, # 12 Exhibit 42, # 13 Exhibit 43, # 14 Exhibit 44, # 15 Exhibit 45, # 16 Exhibit 46, # 17 Exhibit 47, # 18 Exhibit 48, # 19 Exhibit 49, # 20 Exhibit 50, # 21 Exhibit 51, # 22 Exhibit 52, # 23 Exhibit 53, # 24 Exhibit 54, # 25 Exhibit 55, # 26 Exhibit 56, # 27 Exhibit 57, # 28 Exhibit 58, # 29 Exhibit 59, # 30 Exhibit 60, # 31 Exhibit 61, # 32 Exhibit 62, # 33 Exhibit 63, # 34 Exhibit 64, # 35 Exhibit 65, # 36 Exhibit 66)(Bonn, Amanda)
Exhibit 31
US006119101A
Ulllted States Patent [19]
[11] Patent Number:
Peckover
[45]
[54]
6,119,101
Date of Patent:
Se . 12 a 2000
[75]
INTELLIGENT AGENTS FOR ELECTRONIC
5,473,732 12/1995 Chang ..................................... .. 395/77
COMMERCE
5,557,518
5,603,031
Inventor:
Douglas L. Peckover, Dallas County,
576647115
TeX
5,696,965
'
.
9/1996 Rosen
2/1997 White et al
9/ 1997
364/408
395/683
Frasef ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ -- 705/37
12/1997 Dedrlck ................................... .. 707/10
5,717,866
2/1998
NaftZger .................................. .. 705/14
5,721,831
2/1998
Waits et al.
5,721,832
_
2/1998 Westrope etal. ....................... .. 705/27
.....
. . . ..
705/10
[73]
Asslgnee' personalAgents’ Inc" Dallas’ TeX‘
5,724,521
3/1998
[21]
Appl.No.: 08/784,829
5,740,549
4/1998 Reilly etal. .
[22]
F1 d
5,745,882
4/1998 Bixler et al. ............................ .. 705/26
1 e :
J
an.
17 1997
’
RltdU.S.A
ea e
Dedrick ................................... .. 705/26
705/14
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
l'
t'
Dt
pp lea Ion
a a
Connolly, Daniel W., “Proposals for Gathering Consumer
[60]
[51]
Provisional application No. 60/010,087, Jan. 17, 1996.
In t . C17 .......................... .. G06F 17/40 ; G06F 17/60 ;
.
G06F 17/30
[52]
Demographics”,
h?P1//WWW-W3-0rg/Pub/W ‘NW/Demo
graphics/ Proposals.html, pp. 1—6, Nov. 06, 1995.
(List continued on neXt page.)
US. Cl. ............................... .. 705/26; 705/27;
Primary Examiner
_
,nen R‘ MacDonald
Assistant Examiner—James W. Myhre
Fleld Of Search ................................ ..
Attorney)
Or Firm_W?SOn sonsini Goodrich &
Rosati
[56]
References Cited
[57]
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
ABSTRACT
A system for electronic commerce (10) having personal
agents (12 and 13) that represent consumers and providers in
_
4,817,080
3/1989
479847155
1/1991 Geier et aL
solia ........................................ .. 370/17
_ 364/401
a virtual marketplace (28). Consumer personal agents con
4’992’940
2/1991 Dworkin ______ __
_ 364/401
ceal the identity of the consumer and are capable of creating
4,999,806
3/1991 Chernow er a1,
364/900
decision agents (14) that shop for products and assist con
4,999,833
3/1991 Lee ....................................... .. 370/94.1
sumers in comparing and ranking products. Provider per
5,131,039
7/1992 Chaum .................................... .. 380/23
sonal agents are Capable of Creating demand agents
52027921
4/1993 Herzberg ct a1~
380/23
quantify demand and target speci?c consumers Without
5,239,617
5,283,731
8/1993 Gardner et al. ......................... .. 395/12
2/1994 Lalonde et al. ....................... .. 364/401
learning the identity of the Consumers‘ Based on data
enerated b the activities of the decision a ems and on
5,299,115
3/1994
Fields et al.
.... .. 705/10
572997125
3/1994 Baker et a1‘
364/41908
preference data maintained by consumer personal agents,
573177677
5,319,542
5/1994 Dolan et aL
6/1994 King’ ]L et a1_
____ __ 395/77
_ 364/401
provider personal agents can quantify current, historical, and
future demand, simulate demand, and target speci?c con
6/1994 Tanaka er a1, _
_ 364/468
10/1994 Stent ert al. .......................... .. 702/187
11/1994 Kadashevich et a1- ---------- -- 364/419-13
sumers for advertising and other messages. Provider per
sonal agents can cooperate With consumer personal agents to
collect data about reasons for sales and lost sales and to offer
5,321,620
5,355,327
5,369,577
573797420
1/1995
533903281
2/1995 Luclw et a1‘
UHHFT
---------------
- - - ~~
g
395/600
y
.
.
that
consideration payments to
395/12
g
consumers.
Consumer personal
agents can automatically reject unsolicited messages that do
"
not satisfy the consumer’s preferences.
5,440,634
8/1995 Jones et al.
5,444,823
8/1995 Nguyen ................................... .. 395/51
.... .. 380/24
57 Claims, 46 Drawing Sheets
10
AgentSystem
I
l
‘
18
l
l
l
l
|
l
Decision
l
l
15
Agenl
I
l
|
‘Anonymous
I
l
l
l
Pmdum
Product
Recommendations
Quantllled
Demand
Demand
Query
Query
r
l
r
Consumer
Personal
l
|
Provider
Personal A
Agent
l
l
13
Agent
A
|
l
l
Product
Filtered Product
Recommendations
Query
|
Filtered
Quanti?ed
Demand
Query
Demand
l
20
Consumer
User
Provide!
User
21
6,119,101
Page 2
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
from World Wide Web site “http://digicash.support.n1/pub
Streams Online Media Development, “Streams Readies
Release of Breakthrough Internet Media Planning and
lish/sciam.html” on Apr. 3,1997 (8 pages).
Chaum, D. “Security Without Identi?cation: Card Comput
Assessment”, http://streams.com/press ireleasehtml, pp.
1—2, Aug. 31, 1995.
Tassone, Dominic , “The Lilypad White Paper”, http://
WWW.lilypad.net/paper.html,pp. 1—9 & 1—5 Feb. 1, 1997.
Chaum, D. “Achieving Electronic Privacy”, Scienti?c
American, Aug. 1992, pp. 96—101, copy supplied printed
ers to make Big Brother Obsolete”, Communications of the
ACM, vol. 28, pp. 1030—1044, Oct. 1985, copy supplied
printed from World Wide Web site “http://digicash.sup
port.n1/publish/bigbro.html” on Apr. 3, 1997 (24 pages).
International Preliminary Examination Report dated Jan. 13,
1998 (PCT/US97/01057, ?led Jan. 17, 1997), 6 pages.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?