Weber v. Pact XPP Technologies, AG et al
Filing
67
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 63 Report and Recommendations granting 14 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/29/2015. (ch, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
PETER WEBER
v.
PACT XPP TECHNOLOGIES, AG
§
§
§
§
§
Case No. 2:13-CV-0995-JRG-RSP
AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS ON GROUNDS OF
FORUM NON CONVENIENS
On March 24, 2015, this Court issued an Order adopting the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation granting PACT XPP Technologies, AG’s (“PACT”) Motion to Dismiss on
Grounds of Forum Non Conveniens (See Dkt. No. 65, “Order Adopting”; Dkt. No. 64,
“Objections”; Dkt. No. 63, “Findings and Recommendation”; Dkt. No. 14, “Motion to
Dismiss”).
Defendant PACT has filed a Motion to Reconsider (Dkt. No. 66) on March 25, 2015,
asking the Court to clarify that the Order Adopting was issued after a de novo review of the
.
record by the undersigned. While that was implicit in the Order Adopting, the Court does hereby
make it explicit, noting that it conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the
Findings and Recommendation as to which objection was made under Federal Rule 72(b)(3), and
found no error therein. Accordingly, this action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE to refiling same in an appropriate court in Germany. The Clerk is directed to
close this case.
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of March, 2015.
____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?