SynQor Inc. v. Vicor Corporation

Filing 643

ORDER SETTING FORTH COURTS RULINGS ON DISPUTED EXHIBITS re 617 Sealed Document, 615 Sealed Document. Signed by Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter on 10/7/2022. (nlp, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
SYNQOR, INC.
V.
VICOR CORPORATION

§
§
§
§
§

No. 2:14-CV-287-RWS-JBB

ORDER SETTING FORTH COURT’S RULINGS ON DISPUTED EXHIBITS
The Court, having considered the parties’ joint briefs (Dkt. Nos. 615, 617) and the
arguments of Plaintiff SynQor, Inc. and Defendant Vicor Corporation (collectively “the Parties”)
regarding objections to exhibits, sets forth the Court’s rulings from the October 6-7, 2022 pretrial
conference as follows:
VICOR’S OBJECTIONS TO SYNQOR’S EXHIBITS
PRESENTED AT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
1)

Category 1
Vicor withdraws its objections to exhibits PTX1389, PTX1390, PTX1391, PTX1393, and

PTX2295.
The Court sustains Vicor’s objections to the admissibility of the following exhibits, subject
to SynQor being allowed to approach Judge Schroeder if SynQor believes Vicor has opened the
door to their use: PTX1392, PTX2548.
The Court overrules Vicor’s objections to the admissibility of the following exhibit, subject
to the Parties working together to redact any reference to the Ericsson settlement and license
agreement: PTX2564.
The Court overrules Vicor’s objections to the admissibility of the following exhibit, subject
to the Parties working together to redact reference to $50 per part: PTX0973.
1

2)

Category 2
Vicor withdraws its objections to PTX2299, PTX2303, PTX2304, and PTX1442.
The Court overrules Vicor’s objections to the admissibility of the following exhibit, subject

to the Parties working together to redact any reference to the Ericsson settlement and license
agreement: PTX2302.
The Court sustains Vicor’s objection to the following as an exhibit; it may be used with
expert witnesses before the jury and as a demonstrative only: PTX2531.
The Court overrules Vicor’s hearsay objections to the following exhibits, and their
admissibility as to specific information contained with the Form 10-Ks will be governed by the
Court’s ruling on Vicor’s in limine 5: PTX1174, PTX2501, PTX2502, PTX2503, PTX2504,
PTX2505, PTX2506, PTX2507, PTX2508, PTX2509, PTX2510, PTX2511, PTX2512, PTX2513,
PTX2514.
The Court overrules Vicor’s objection to PTX1394.
3)

Category 3
SynQor withdraws the following exhibit: PTX2433.
The Court sustains Vicor’s objections to the following exhibits: PTX2423, PTX2430,

PTX2431.
The Court overrules Vicor’s objections to the following exhibits: PTX2426, PTX2427,
PTX2428, PTX2429, PTX2438, PTX2439, PTX2440, PTX2441.
Regarding Vicor’s objection to PTX2437, the appropriate expert for SynQor may rely on
this exhibit if a proper foundation can be laid at trial pursuant to FRE 703.

2

4)

Category 4
The Court sustains Vicor’s objections to the following exhibits (Cisco’s shipping and

manufacturing data) at this time; however, the information may be used with expert witnesses
before the jury. To the extent a proper foundation is laid at trial, SynQor may approach Judge
Schroeder as to their admissibility as exhibits: PTX0594, PTX0595, PTX0596, PTX0597,
PTX0598, PTX0599, PTX0600, PTX0601, PTX0602, PTX0603, PTX0604, PTX0605, PTX0606,
PTX0607, PTX0608, PTX0609, PTX0610, PTX0611, PTX0612, PTX0613, PTX0614, PTX0615,
PTX0616, PTX0617, PTX0618, PTX0619, PTX0620, PTX0621, PTX0622, PTX0623, PTX0624,
PTX0625, PTX0626, PTX0627, PTX0628, PTX0629, PTX0630, PTX0631, PTX0632, PTX0633,
PTX0634, PTX0635, PTX0636, PTX0637, PTX0638, PTX0639, PTX0640, PTX0641, PTX0642,
PTX0643, PTX0644, PTX0645, PTX0646, PTX0647, PTX0648, PTX0649, PTX0650, PTX0651,
PTX0652, PTX0653, PTX0654, PTX0655, PTX0656, PTX0657, PTX0658, PTX0659, PTX0660,
PTX0661, PTX0662, PTX0663, PTX0664, PTX0665, PTX0666, PTX0667, PTX0668, PTX0669,
PTX0670, PTX1105, PTX1301, PTX1302, PTX1303, PTX1304, PTX1305, PTX1306, PTX1307,
PTX1308, PTX1309, PTX1310, PTX1311, PTX1312, PTX1313, PTX1314, PTX1315, PTX1316,
PTX1317, PTX1318, PTX1319, PTX1320, PTX1321, PTX1322, PTX1323, PTX1324, PTX1325,
PTX1326, PTX1327, PTX1328, PTX1329, PTX1330, PTX1331, PTX1332, PTX1362, PTX1363,
PTX1364, PTX1365, PTX1366, PTX1375, PTX1376, PTX1377, PTX1378, PTX1379, PTX1380,
PTX1381, PTX2241, PTX2242, PTX2243, PTX2244, PTX2245, PTX2246, PTX2247, PTX2248,
PTX2249, PTX2250, PTX2251, PTX2252, PTX2253, PTX2496, PTX2497, PTX2498, PTX2499,
PTX2500.
The Court sustains Vicor’s objections to the following exhibits at this time; however, if
Vicor challenges Mr. Reed and opens the door, and to the extent a proper foundation is laid at trial,
3

SynQor may approach Judge Schroeder as to their admissibility as exhibits: PTX2515, PTX2516,
PTX2517, PTX2518, PTX2519, PTX2520, PTX2521, PTX2522, PTX2523, PTX2524, PTX2525,
PTX2526, PTX2527, PTX2528, PTX2529, PTX2530.
5)

Category 5
The Court sustains Vicor’s objections to the following exhibits, unless the Parties agree

otherwise as to the resumes of the experts: PTX1668, PTX2533, PTX2450.
The Court overrules Vicor’s objections to test results. The following exhibits are preadmitted subject to Dr. Dickens’ laying a foundation for their use at trial: PTX1682, PTX1683,
PTX1684, PTX2041, PTX2042, PTX2043, PTX0315, PTX0316, PTX0317, PTX0318, PTX0319,
PTX0321, PTX0322, PTX0323, PTX0324, PTX0325, PTX0326, PTX0327, PTX0331, PTX0334,
PTX0335, PTX0338, PTX0339, PTX0340, PTX0341, PTX0344, PTX0347, PTX0348, PTX0562.
The Court sustains Vicor’s objections to the following exhibits at this time, subject to the
Parties working together on new summaries which are agreeable to both sides and more easily
understood by the jury: PTX1838, PTX1966, PTX2087, PTX2452. Mr. Reed may still show this
information as a demonstrative.
6)

Category 6
SynQor or third party emails, press releases, or PowerPoints
SynQor withdraws the following exhibit: PTX0978.
The Court overrules Vicor’s objections to the following exhibits based upon their use with

witnesses during their depositions in the ’54 case: PTX1286, PTX1487, PTX1495.
The Court overrules Vicor’s objections to the following exhibits: PTX1114, PTX1115.
Vicor withdraws its objections to exhibits PTX1478, PTX1479, PTX1480, PTX1520,
PTX1522, PTX1525, PTX1542.
4

SynQor withdraws exhibit PTX1491. SynQor may play PTX1491as a demonstrative.
The Court overrules Vicor’s objections to exhibits PTX1483, PTX1484, subject to SynQor
laying a proper foundation at trial.
Prior litigation filings
SynQor withdraws exhibit PTX1288.
The Court sustains Vicor’s objections to PTX1642, PTX1644, PTX2012. SynQor may use
the information for impeachment purposes.
The Court overrules Vicor’s objections to PTX2557, PTX2237, PTX2238, PTX2239,
PTX2240.
Academic articles
The Court sustains Vicor’s objections to PTX2570, PTX1496, PTX1597, PTX1600,
PTX1620, PTX1621, PTX1622, PTX2571; however, the information may be used with witnesses
before the jury.
The Court overrules Vicor’s objection to exhibit PTX1499.
Third party purchase orders
The Court overrules Vicor’s objections to the following exhibits, subject to SynQor laying
the proper foundation at trial: PTX1268, PTX1273.
SynQor screenshots of markings
The Court overrules Vicor’s objections to the following exhibits, subject to SynQor laying
the proper foundation at trial: PTX2386, PTX2387.
Prager Declaration
The Court sustains Vicor’s objection to exhibit PTX2589. SynQor may use this for
impeachment purposes.
5

7)

Category 7
Exhibits purportedly showing competitive analysis
The Court overrules Vicor’s objections to the following exhibits: PTX1230, PTX1222,

PTX1223, PTX2401, PTX1212. SynQor may use these exhibits for intent/willfulness, not
obviousness.
Prior filings
The Court overrules Vicor’s objections to the following exhibits: PTX1643, PTX1645,
PTX1652, PTX2588. SynQor may use the information for impeachment purposes.
8)

Category 8
To the extent Vicor’s state law counterclaims remain in this trial, the Court overrules

Vicor’s relevance objection to the following exhibits: PTX1649, PTX1648, PTX2030, PTX2031,
PTX2033, PTX1651, PTX2549, PTX2552, PTX2553, PTX2032, PTX2554, PTX2550, PTX2551.
9)

Category 9 – Vicor interrogatory responses
The Court sustains Vicor’s objections to interrogatories as exhibits. However, the Court

will allow SynQor to read interrogatory responses into the record and also to be used as
demonstratives. The Court will allow Vicor to do the same with interrogatories to be identified by
Vicor on or before October 9, 2022.
SYNQOR’S OBJECTIONS TO VICOR’S EXHIBITS
PRESENTED AT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
1)

Exhibits related to Vicor’s state law counterclaims
The Court overrules SynQor’s objections as to the following exhibits: DTX0141,

DTX0144, DTX0161, DTX0190, DTX0192, DTX0194, DTX0202, DTX0234, DTX0260,
DTX0262, DTX0276, DTX0299, DTX0300, DTX0321, DTX1020, DTX1021, DTX1040,
DTX1104, DTX1106, DTX1109, DTX1125, DTX1131, DTX1144, DTX1148, DTX1158,
6

DTX1161, DTX1410, DTX1411, DTX1412, DTX1413, DTX1422, DTX1427, DTX1428. If
personal animosity between the heads of the companies and/or inflammatory evidence regarding
SynQor’s alleged unfair competition become too much of a focal point of the trial, SynQor may
approach the bench and address the issue with Judge Schroeder.
The Court sustains SynQor’s objections to the following exhibits: DTX0182, DTX0195,
DTX251, DTX0319, DTX0545, DTX1423.
The Court sustains SynQor’s objection to exhibit DTX1128. However, this information
may be used for impeachment purposes.
The Court overrules SynQor’s objection to exhibit DTX0212, with appropriate redaction
as to No. 5.
2)

Exhibits related to Vicor’s equitable defenses
Vicor withdraws the following exhibits: DTX0934, DTX0936, DTX1406, DTX1431.

3)

Alleged inflammatory emails
The Court sustains SynQor’s objections to the following exhibits: DTX0055, DTX0128,

DTX0164, DTX0211, DTX0221.
4)

Reexaminations of SynQor’s patents by Vicor and Third-Party Murata
Vicor withdrew the following exhibits in advance of the hearing based on the preliminary

in limine rulings: DTX0015, DTX1379, DTX1382, DTX1385.
At the hearing, Vicor withdrew the following exhibits: DTX0003, DTX0004, DTX0011,
DTX0012, DTX1227, DTX1229, DTX1380, DTX1381, DTX1383, DTX1384.
5)

NBMs
Vicor withdraws the following exhibits: DPX0020, DTX1238, DTX1243, DTX1248,

DTX1362, DTX1364, DTX1365.
7

6)

Documents describing factorized power architecture (“FPA”)
SynQor withdraws its objections to the following exhibits: DTX0428, DTX0444,

DTX0449, DTX0450, DTX0453, DTX0454, DTX0464, DTX0467, DTX0493, DTX0599,
DTX0744, DTX0745, DTX0750, DTX0752, DTX0770, DTX0844, DTX0854, DTX0858,
DTX0883, DTX0068, DTX0077, DTX1416, DTX0433, DTX0451, DTX0455, DTX0465,
DTX0476, DTX0480, DTX0482, DTX0570, DTX0632, DTX0865.
7)

Modified IBC
The Court overrules SynQor’s objection to the following exhibit: DPX0003.

8)

Physical exhibits not produced during discovery
Vicor withdraws exhibit DPX0020.
The Court reserves its ruling on SynQor’s objections to the following exhibits at this time,

allowing SynQor the opportunity to inspect the physical exhibits and/or raise with Judge Schroeder
during trial Vicor’s purported lack of disclosure during discovery: DPX0006, DPX0007,
DPX0008, DPX0013, DPX0014, DPX0015, DPX0016.
9)

Prior art not on Vicor’s narrowed list
Vicor withdraws as exhibits the following Cobos references: DTX1081, DTX0218.
The Court sustains SynQor’s objections to the following exhibits: DTX0027, DTX0029,

DTX0096, DTX0097, DTX0098, DTX0337, DTX0348, DTX0363, DTX0370, DTX0387,
DTX0406, DTX0650, DTX0667, DTX0668, DTX0676, DTX0677, DTX0683, DTX0842,
DTX1077, DTX1181.

8

10)

Exhibits regarding SynQor’s knowledge of, or comparison of its bus converters to,
Vicor’s bus converters
The Court sustains SynQor’s objections to the following exhibits: DTX0032, DTX0036,

DTX0057, DTX0152, DTX0156, DTX0226, DTX1167, DTX1424, DTX1425. This information
may be used for impeachment purposes.
11)

Advice of counsel
The Court reserves its ruling on SynQor’s objection to the following exhibit, as redacted

by Vicor at the pretrial conference: DTX0481. The parties shall approach the bench regarding this
redacted exhibit in the context of Dr. Vinciarelli’s testimony at trial.
12)

Valuations of SynQor
SynQor withdraws its objections to the following exhibits, as redacted and agreed to by the

Parties: DTX0284, DTX0288, DTX0289.
13)

Non-comparable license agreements
The Court overrules SynQor’s objections to the following exhibits: DTX0515, DTX0519,

DTX0616, DTX0618, DTX0619, DTX0640, DTX0641, DTX0642, DTX0643.
14)

Vicor ads and articles
The Court overrules SynQor’s objections to the following exhibits: DTX0708, DTX0720,

DTX0725, DTX0749, DTX0755, DTX0763, DTX0766, DTX0793, DTX0794, DTX0870,
DTX1084.
15)

Vicor patents
SynQor withdraws its objections to exhibit DTX0639.
Vicor withdraws the following exhibits: DTX1238, DTX1243, DTX1248.
The Court overrules SynQor’s objections to the following exhibits: DTX0807, DTX0815,

DTX0816, DTX0817, DTX0798.
9

16)

Exhibits regarding Raytheon’s use of Vicor BCMs
The Court overrules SynQor’s objections to the following exhibits: DTX0634, DTX0636,

DTX0876.
17)

Exhibits regarding MicroPAC
The Court reserves its ruling on SynQor’s objections to the following exhibits, to be

addressed at the same time the Court considers the Parties’ objections to deposition designations:
DPX0006, DTX0555, DTX0556, DTX0557, DTX0558, DTX0559, DTX0560, DTX0561,
DTX0562, DTX0564, DTX0565, DTX0587, DTX0631, DTX0633, DTX0637, DTX0860,
DTX0861.
18)

Damages reports exhibits
Vicor withdraws the following exhibits: DTX1219, DTX1220. However, the Court

encouraged the Parties to try to agree on the use of demonstratives from the Parties’ experts’
damages reports.
19)

Untimely exhibits
The Court overrules SynQor’s timeliness objections to the following exhibits: DTX1410,

DTX1411, DTX1412, DTX1413, DTX1414, DTX1415, DTX1416, DTX1417, DTX1418,
DTX1422, DTX1423, DTX1424, DTX1425, DTX1427, DTX1428, DTX1429, DTX1430,
DTX1431, DTX1434, DTX1439, DTX1440. The Parties are instructed to apply the Court’s
previous rulings on similar exhibits to this grouping.
To the extent warranted, the Court will take up any remaining objections to these exhibits
at the same time the Court considers the Parties’ objections to deposition designations.

10

20)

SynQor emails
The Court overrules SynQor’s objections to the following exhibits: DTX0062, DTX0085,

DTX0090. SynQor may approach the bench if the evidence regarding failures of SynQor
converters in certain third-party applications becomes too much a focal point during trial.
21)

PowerQor documents
Vicor withdraws exhibit DTX0873.
The Court overrules SynQor’s objection to the following exhibit: DTX0093.
The Court sustains SynQor’s objections to the following exhibits: DTX1415, DTX1418.

Vicor may use the information for impeachment purposes.
22)

Steigerwald CV
Absent an agreement between the Parties regarding resumes, the Court sustains SynQor’s

objection to the following exhibit: DTX1163. Vicor is allowed to amend Dr. Steigerwald’s
deposition designations to include his background information.
23)

Emails relaying Vicor’s “non-infringement”
The Court overrules SynQor’s objection to exhibit DTX0624, with the Parties ordered to

meet and confer on agreed redactions to the exhibit in line with the Court’s guidance at the pretrial
conference.
Regarding exhibits DTX0613/DTX1185, the Court sustains SynQor’s objections to the top
two emails contained in the exhibit but overrules SynQor’s objections to the bottom email
contained in the exhibit, with appropriate redactions. Vicor may approach the bench to the extent
SynQor opens the door to the exhibit’s use.

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this the 7th day of October, 2022.

____________________________________
J. Boone Baxter
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12