Webb v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/28/2016. (sm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION LINDA SUE WEBB, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § Case No. 2:15-cv-051-RWS-RSP ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 16). Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 17). Specifically, Plaintiff objects that the “Magistrate Judge erred in finding that the ALJ’s credibility finding is supported by substantial evidence and . therefore not erroneous.” (Dkt. No. 17 at 1). Plaintiff contends that the ALJ did not adequately address the seven factors of Social Security Ruling 96-7 in making his credibility determination. (Id. at 2 (citing Dkt. No. 16 at 3)). On de novo review, the Court finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s findings that the Administrative Law Judge adequately and appropriately considered the evidence of record in reaching his credibility determination, and that substantial evidence supports the determination. (See Dkt. No. 16 at 3). Having considered the objections and finding no merit, the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED as those of the Court. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28th day of September, 2016. ____________________________________ ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?