SyncPoint Imaging, LLC v. Nintendo of America Inc. et al

Filing 283

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 279 , OVERRULED 282 Objections to Report and Recommendation Denying 260 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 2/9/2018. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (ch, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SYNCPOINT IMAGING, LLC, Plaintiff, v. NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC., et al.; Defendants. § § § Case No. 2:15-cv-00247-JRG-RSP § § § § § § ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation entered by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends denying SyncPoint’s motion to dismiss the case without prejudice for mootness and further recommends that a dismissal with prejudice be entered. For dispositive matters referred to a Magistrate Judge, the district court must “determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). “The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommend disposition.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Having fully reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo, and having found SyncPoint’s objections unpersuasive, the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition. Accordingly, It is ORDERED: (1) SyncPoint’s objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 282, are OVERRULED. (2) The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 279, is ADOPTED. (3) SyncPoint’s motion to dismiss without prejudice, Dkt. No. 260, is DENIED. 1 (4) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to close this case. SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 9th day of February, 2018. ____________________________________ RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?