Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al

Filing 396

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 375 Report and Recommendations, 263 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc., Huaweis objections, 390 are OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/13/2017. (nkl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD,

v.
T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE U.S.A.,
INC.,

§
§
§
§
§
§

Case No. 2:16-CV-00052-JRG-RSP

ORDER
Huawei objects to Judge Payne’s recommendation that T-Mobile’s motion for summary
judgment of noninfringement of the ’339 patent under the doctrine of equivalents be granted.
Having reviewed the objections, and having considered the Report and Recommendation de novo,
the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
.
72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Accordingly,
It is ORDERED:
(1) Huawei’s objections, Dkt. 390, are OVERRULED.
(2) Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation, Dkt. 375, is ADOPTED.
(3) T-Mobile’s motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. 263, is GRANTED.

SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 13th day of September, 2017.

____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE