Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
Filing
331
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 302 Report and Recommendations, DENYING 115 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/6/2017. (ch, ) Modified on 9/7/2017 (ch, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD,
§
§
§
§
§
§
v.
T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE U.S.A.,
INC.,
Case No. 2:16-CV-00052-JRG-RSP
Case No. 2:16-CV-00055-JRG-RSP
Case No. 2:16-CV-00056-JRG-RSP
Case No. 2:16-CV-00057-JRG-RSP
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Payne issued a Report and Recommendation, which recommended
denying Huawei’s motion to dismiss the counterclaims filed by the T-Mobile defendants. The
Report and Recommendation was filed on August 21, 2017, and the parties had until September
.
5, 2017, to file any objections. No objections were filed, and the time to do so has now passed. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).
Accordingly,
It is ORDERED:
(1) Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.
(2) Huawei’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.1
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of September, 2017.
____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Dkt. 121 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00052;
Dkt. 115 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00055;
Dkt. 119 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00056;
Dkt. 114 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00057.
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?