Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al

Filing 317

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 307 Report and Recommendations, 248 Sealed Motion, filed by Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd, 313 OBJECTION OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/6/2017. (nkl, )

Case 2:16-cv-00056-JRG-RSP Document 317 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 9908

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD,

§
§
§
§
§
§

v.
T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE U.S.A.,
INC.,

Case No. 2:16-CV-00052-JRG-RSP
Case No. 2:16-CV-00055-JRG-RSP
Case No. 2:16-CV-00056-JRG-RSP
Case No. 2:16-CV-00057-JRG-RSP

ORDER
Huawei Technologies Co. LTD (“Huawei”) objects to Judge Payne’s recommendation that
Huawei’s motion for summary judgment on the affirmative defenses and counterclaims filed by
T-Mobile US, Inc., and T-Mobile U.S.A. Inc. (collectively, “T-Mobile”) relating to Huawei’s
commitments to the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (“ETSI”) be denied.1
Having reviewed the objections, and having considered the Report and Recommendation de novo,
the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Accordingly,
It is ORDERED:
(1) Huawei’s objections are OVERRULED.
(2) Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.
(3) Huawei’s motions for summary judgment are DENIED.2

1

Dkt. 358 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00052;
Dkt. 327 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00055;
Dkt. 313 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00056;
Dkt. 311 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00057.

2

Dkt. 257 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00052;
Dkt. 246 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00055;
Dkt. 248 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00056;
1

Case 2:16-cv-00056-JRG-RSP Document 317 Filed 09/06/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 9909

SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of September, 2017.

____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dkt. 242 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00057.
2