Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al

Filing 190

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 161 Report and Recommendation, (Navicos Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Assignor Estoppel and the Validity of the 022 Patent (Dkt. No. 104) is DENIED) AND 166 Report and Recommendation, (Navicos Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement of the 022 Patent (Dkt. No. 101) is DENIED). Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/8/2017. (slo, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
NAVICO INC. and NAVICO
HOLDING AS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. and
GARMIN USA, INC.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

NO. 2:16-CV-00190-JRG-RSP

ORDER
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate
Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Before the Court are various recommendations
by Magistrate Judge Payne. Neither party has filed any objections to these recommendations.
Having reviewed each Report and Recommendation, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
(1)

Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 161) recommending
denial of Navico’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Assignor Estoppel
and the Validity of the ’022 Patent (Dkt. No. 104) is hereby ADOPTED. Navico’s Motion (Dkt. No. 104) is therefore DENIED.

(2)

Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 166) recommending
denial of Navico’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement of the ’022
Patent (Dkt. No. 101) is hereby ADOPTED. Navico’s Motion (Dkt. No. 101) is therefore
DENIED.

So Ordered this
Aug 8, 2017