Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al

Filing 211

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 195 Report and Recommendation. (Navicos Motion (Dkt. No. 103) is GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, Navicos Motion is GRANTED with respect to the Kongsberg MS1000 System and claims 48, 49, 61, and 62 of the 022 Patent, but otherwise DENIED.) Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/31/2017. (slo, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION NAVICO INC. and NAVICO HOLDING AS, Plaintiffs, v. GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. and GARMIN USA, INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § NO. 2:16-CV-00190-JRG-RSP ORDER The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 195) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that Navico’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment That No Asserted Claims Are Anticipated (Dkt. No. 103) . be granted in part. Neither party has filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation. Having considered the Report, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 195) is hereby ADOPTED. Navico’s Motion (Dkt. No. 103) is therefore GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, Navico’s Motion is GRANTED with respect to the Kongsberg MS1000 System and claims 48, 49, 61, and 62 of the ’022 Patent, but otherwise DENIED. SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 31st day of August, 2017. ____________________________________ RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?