Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al
Filing
211
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 195 Report and Recommendation. (Navicos Motion (Dkt. No. 103) is GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, Navicos Motion is GRANTED with respect to the Kongsberg MS1000 System and claims 48, 49, 61, and 62 of the 022 Patent, but otherwise DENIED.) Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/31/2017. (slo, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
NAVICO INC. and NAVICO
HOLDING AS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. and
GARMIN USA, INC.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
NO. 2:16-CV-00190-JRG-RSP
ORDER
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate
Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Before the Court is the Report and
Recommendation (Dkt. No. 195) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that Navico’s
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment That No Asserted Claims Are Anticipated (Dkt. No. 103)
.
be granted in part. Neither party has filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Having considered the Report, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report
and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 195) is hereby ADOPTED. Navico’s Motion (Dkt. No. 103) is
therefore GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, Navico’s Motion is GRANTED with respect to the
Kongsberg MS1000 System and claims 48, 49, 61, and 62 of the ’022 Patent, but otherwise
DENIED.
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 31st day of August, 2017.
____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?