Semcon IP Inc. v. Huawei Device USA Inc. et al
Filing
661
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 567 Report and Recommendations. Denying 301 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. Semcon's objections 632 OVERRULED. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 4/4/2018. (ch, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
SEMCON IP INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
STMICROELECTRONICS INC.,
STMICROELECTRONICS N.V.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Case No. 2:16-cv-00437-JRG-RSP (Lead)
Case No. 2:16-cv-00439-JRG-RSP (Member)
ORDER
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Payne’s recommendation to deny Semcon’s motion
for summary judgment that the ’627 patent is not invalid in view of the Hitachi SH-4 reference.
Dkt. No. 567. For dispositive matters referred to a magistrate judge, the district court must
“determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected
to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). “The district judge may accept, reject, or
modify the recommend disposition.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Having
.
considered the recommendation de novo, and having reviewed Semcon’s objections thereto, the
Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
(1)
Semcon’s objections, Dkt. No. 632, are OVERRULED.
(2)
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 567, is ADOPTED.
(3) Semcon’s motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. No. 301, is DENIED.
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 4th day of April, 2018.
____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?