Music Choice v. Stingray Digital Group Inc.

Filing 312

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 271 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 11/15/2019. (nkl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
MUSIC CHOICE,
Plaintiff,
v.
STINGRAY DIGITAL INC. (f/k/a
STINGRAY DIGITAL GROUP INC.)
and STINGRAY MUSIC USA, INC.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Case No. 2:16-CV-00586-JRG-RSP

ORDER
The Magistrate Judge previously entered his Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Dkt.
No. 271), which recommended denial of Defendants Stingray Digital Inc. (f/k/a/ Stingray Digital
Group Inc.) and Stingray Music USA, Inc.’s (“Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment of
Estoppel as to Claims 10 and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 9,357,245 (“Motion”). (Dkt. No. 193).
Defendants have now filed an Objection to that Report. (Dkt. No. 286).
After de novo consideration of the briefing on Defendants’ Motion, the Report, and
Defendants’ Objection to the Report, the Court concludes that the objections are without
sufficient merit. For that reason and the other reasons stated within the Report, the Court agrees
with the conclusion reached within the Report. The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is
therefore ADOPTED.

So Ordered this
Nov 15, 2019