Preferential Networks IP, LLC v. AT&T Mobility, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 19 Motion to Dismiss, filed by AT&T Mobility, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility, AT&T Mobility II, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility, New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Mobility, Cricket Wireless LLC, 44 Report and Recommendations,. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/31/2017. (nkl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
PREFERENTIAL NETWORKS IP, LLC,
AT&T INC. MOBILITY, LLC D/B/A
AT&T MOBILITY, AT&T MOBILITY
II LLC D/B/A AT&T MOBILITY,
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS
SERVICES, INC. D/B/A AT&T
MOBILITY, and CRICKET
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate
Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Now before the Court is the Report and
Recommendation (Dkt. No. 44) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6) (Dkt. No. 19) be granted in part. Defendants
objected to the Report (Dkt. No. 45) and Preferential Networks responded (Dkt. No. 46).
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, Defendants’ objections, and
Preferential Networks’s response, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and
Recommendation (Dkt. No. 44) is hereby ADOPTED and Defendants’ objections (Dkt. No. 45)
are OVERRULED. Defendants’ Motion (Dkt. No. 19) is therefore GRANTED IN PART. The
Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion as to Preferential Networks’s allegations of precomplaint willfulness, but DENIES the motion in all other respects.
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 31st day of August, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?